Search<%BANNER[chip_130_l]%>
<%BANNER[left_130x300]%>
<%BANNER[left_130x130_2]%>
InformationX-bit Labs for mobile users! Do not forget that we are running a special version of X-bit Labs web-site for users of mobile and handheld devices: http://pda.xbitlabs.com. Check out our news and articles from smartphones and PDAs to be always updated on the latest computer and technology news. <%BANNER[right_130x600]%>
|
<%BANNER[top_768x90]%>
|
|
|
<%BANNER[banner_468x60]%>
Articles: Chipsets
Contemporary Socket A Chipsets: NVIDIA nForce2 Ultra 400, NVIDIA nForce2 400, SiS748 and VIA KT600 (page 3)Category: Chipsets [ 07/08/2003 | 01:26 PM ] Closer Look: NVIDIA nForce2 400
Watching vain attempts of VIA and SiS to develop a high-performance single-channel chipset for Socket A platform, NVIDIA decided to go on and not very long ago the company introduced one more solution: NVIDIA nForce2 400. in fact, this is the same NVIDIA nForce2 Ultra 400, but featuring only one memory channel. In other words, NVIDIA decided to move from the high-end chipset segment and get some presence in the mainstream as well by offering a solution for mainboards priced around $70-$100. Besides, this way the company could also find an application for the defective NVIDIA nForce2 Ultra 400 chips, which had only one memory channel working properly: they simply disabled one memory channel in such chips and then they were sold under NVIDIA nForce2 400 name. Today there are hardly any NVIDIA nForce2 400 based mainboards in the market: the mainboard guys are waiting for the VIA KT600 and SiS768 to come, so that they could choose the most profitable solution out of these three single-channel chipsets. However, I would like to point out on my part that NVIDIA nForce2 400 is really good choice. If we disregard the absence of SerialATA support, which is definitely a big drawback for this product, we have to admit that the memory controller of NVIDIA nForce2 400 is very successful, even though it is a single-channel one. Even when we reviewed the very first nForce version we stressed that the major trump of NVIDIA chipsets is not the dual-channel design, but the DASP unit (Dynamic Adaptive Speculative Pre-Processor). The second version of this DASP unit has been implemented in NVIDIA nForce2 400 (just like in NVIDIA nForce2 Ultra 400). As you know, this block is theoretically like an additional buffer (or cache, if you like it more), which is built into the chipset North Bridge. This buffer receives data, which should be demanded by the CPU later, according to the logical part of the DASP. This way, the DASP unit can use the memory bus more efficiently and reduce the memory latencies quite tangibly on data addressing in case of successful predictions and appropriate data prefetch. It is exactly this particular data prefetch mechanism of the NVIDIA nForce2 400 memory controller that NVIDIA pins its hopes on in competition with VIA. A little later in this review we will see that DASP proved absolutely up to our expectations in NVIDIA nForce2 400 making this core logic extremely attractive from the price-to-performance ratio point of view.
<%BANNER[banner_468x30]%>
|
Category NewsCategory: Chipsets Friday, May 30, 200810:34 pm Intel and Nvidia Still in Talks Regarding Next-Generation Processor Bus License. Intel and Nvidia Have Disagreement about Quick Path Interconnect License – Intel Wednesday, May 28, 20085:49 am Intel Adopts Previous-Generation Core-Logic for Intel Atom Processors. Intel Validates 945GC Core-Logic to Work with Intel Atom Z500 Chips Monday, May 12, 20088:47 am Intel’s Next-Generation Enthusiast Platform Begins to Take Shape. Intel’s Next-Gen Enthusiast X58 Desktop Platform to Support One Bloomfield CPU, Four GPUs Thursday, April 17, 200810:35 am Nvidia’s Latest Core-Logic Causes Data Corruption During Overclocking – Company. Nvidia Admits Problems with nForce 790i SLI Chipset Thursday, April 10, 20083:45 pm Nvidia and Via Plan to Offer Ultra-Mobile Platform - Report. Nvidia and Via Want to Compete Against Intel Atom All Latest News <%BANNER[right_130x130_1]%>
|
|
<%BANNER[foot_728x90]%> | ||

