Information

X-bit Labs for mobile users! Do not forget that we are running a special version of X-bit Labs web-site for users of mobile and handheld devices: http://pda.xbitlabs.com. Check out our news and articles from smartphones and PDAs to be always updated on the latest computer and technology news.

 

Articles: CPU

Socket AM2 Platform: DDR2 SDRAM Support from AMD (page 21)


Category: CPU

by Ilya Gavrichenkov

[ 05/22/2006 | 09:00 PM ]


Pages : 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21

Conclusion

Summing up everything we have said about the new AMD Socket AM2 platform we have to admit that the introduction of DDR2 SDRAM support is a small evolutionary step forward. Our tests showed that the transition to DDR2 SDRAM doesn’t bring in any significant performance gain. Moreover, you have to make sure that your system uses the fastest DDR2 SDRAM with 800MHz frequency and minimal timings if you want to see any performance improvement at all. The widely spread DDR2-667 SDRAM may sometimes provide absolutely no performance gain at all compared with the Socket 939 platforms supporting DDR400 SDRAM with low timings settings.

In conclusions I would like to say that the arrival of the Socket AM2 platform supporting DDR2 SDRAM is still not an ordinary occasion. Even though Socket AM2 systems do not boast any superior advantages over the Socket 939 platform at this time, the positive effect from this transition will be more evident in the future. Of course, DDR2 SDRAM is a much more promising memory standard. Its working frequency and bandwidth increase dynamically, its price goes down faster and it allows building high-capacity memory DIMM modules. As a result, AMD will certainly win from betting on DDR2. And the timing is simply perfect: no one will accuse AMD of unjustified moves neither from the performance nor from the pricing standpoint.

However, there is no real pressure from Intel, AMD’s main competitor, at this time. AMD CPUs retain their leading positions practically in all applications. The increasing clock speed of the top models has definitely contributed to that: Athlon 64 X2 is now running at 2.6GHz and Athlon 64 FX-62 - at 2.8GHz. Of course, there is some concern that this state of things may change when new Intel Core processors come out, but it is still too early to talk about it.

I have to confess that I was left with a little bit of disappointment deep inside now that I have taken a close look at the new core Revision F processors from AMD. The thing is that company engineers have once again done just a few minor modifications and didn’t make any in-depth architectural changes. This approach to processor improvement will sooner or later lead AMD Athlon 64 processor family to a frustrating defeat in the “armament drive”. Unfortunately, we do not have any information about significant changes of the K8 micro-architecture at this time.

<<< Previous page

Article Rating

Article Rating: 8.83 out of 10
 
Rate this article:
Excellent
Average
Poor
 

Discussion

Comments currently: 24
Discussion started: 05/22/06
View comments

Add your Comment

Name/Nickname
Your Comments
 

Category News

Category: CPU

Thursday, July 3, 2008

11:50 pm Via Nano Processors Set to Arrive in August or September. Via Technologies’ Nano Chips Delayed Again

Friday, June 27, 2008

6:59 pm AMD Readies K8-Class Processors for Low-Power Systems – Pictures. AMD’s Rival for Intel Atom Tested by Company’s Partners

Monday, June 23, 2008

11:00 pm Advanced Micro Devices Set to Compete with Intel Atom and Via Nano Chips – Rumours. AMD Reportedly Plans to Fight for Ultra Low-Cost Personal Computers Market with Sempron-Like Chips

Wednesday, June 18, 2008

7:12 pm Intel Atom Competitor from AMD: Rumors. Bet on AMD64?

Wednesday, June 11, 2008

5:31 pm AMD Denies Cancellation of New-Generation Dual-Core Chips. AMD Claims “Kuma” Gets Ready for Release

 
News Archive
All Latest News