<%BANNER[top_768x90]%>
<%BANNER[banner_468x60_h]%>
<%BANNER[article]%>

Articles: CPU

<%BANNER[fp_160x600_r_1]%>
Pages: [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 ]

Performance in 3D Rendering Applications

AMD processors could do the rendering in 3ds max 5 much faster, if they supported Hyper-Threading technology, which has already helped Intel Pentium 4 processor an immense lot here. As for Athlon 64 3200+, it doesn’t tend to prove anything here, but still defeats Opteron 146 with dual-channel memory subsystem and Athlon XP 3200+ with higher clock frequency.

Faster memory subsystem and SSE2 support have had a very positive effect on the CPUs with AMD64 architecture in Lightwave test. However, Athlon 64 3200+ still doesn’t manage to outperform Pentium 4 3.2GHz.

Note that in all 3D rendering applications low memory subsystem latency appears more important for the performance than high memory bus bandwidth. In all the three tests: 3ds max 5, Lightwave and CINEMA4D, Athlon 64 3200+ outperforms Opteron 146.

Pages: [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 ]

<%BANNER[banner_468x60_f]%>

Discussion

Comments currently: 60
Discussion started: 10/20/03 07:25:49 PM
Latest comment: 03/18/08 11:01:49 PM

View comments

You must log in to add comments.
Unfortunately, the old registrations do not work anymore. Please register again. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me