Articles: CPU
 

Bookmark and Share

(40) 
Pages: [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 ]

Performance

SYSMark 2004 SE: Overall Performance

Our first benchmark shows that the flaws in the new 65nm CPU we’ve discussed above do not have a big effect on its performance. Yet you may note that the speed of the Athlon 64 X2 4800+ is closer to that of the Athlon 64 X2 4600+ than of the Athlon 64 X2 5000+. Representing the opposite camp, the Core 2 Duo E6400 is considerably faster than any of the tested Athlon 64 X2 in SYSMark 2004 SE, although is cheaper even than the Athlon 64 X2 4600+.

Futuremark: Synthetic Benchmarks

There are no surprises here. Being slower with memory due to its lower frequency and to the higher latency of the L2 cache, the Athlon 64 X2 4800+ anyway fits exactly within the results of the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ and Athlon 64 X2 4600+.

 
Pages: [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 ]

Discussion

Comments currently: 40
Discussion started: 01/04/07 10:47:27 AM
Latest comment: 12/19/15 06:39:55 AM

View comments

Add your Comment