Information

X-bit Labs for mobile users! Do not forget that we are running a special version of X-bit Labs web-site for users of mobile and handheld devices: http://pda.xbitlabs.com. Check out our news and articles from smartphones and PDAs to be always updated on the latest computer and technology news.

 

Articles: CPU

AMD Athlon 64 3800+ CPU: E3 Processor Core aka Venice at the Door (page 7)


Category: CPU

by Ilya Gavrichenkov

[ 04/03/2005 | 04:06 PM ]


Pages : 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14

Testbed and Methods

In order to evaluate how greatly the new Venice sore affected the performance of Athlon 64 processors compared with the performance of their fellows on ClawHammer and Newcastle cores, we carried out a brief comparative test session for the Athlon 64 3800+ and Athlon 64 3500+ based on different cores. Of course, the SSE3 instructions support as well as the enhancements of the integrated memory controller improved the performance of the new Athlon 64 on E3 core stepping aka Venice. On the other hand, this performance gain will not be that noticeable, because the processor rating system remained the same. What I am trying to say is that the old relation between the clock frequency and performance rating is also true for the new Athlon 64 on Venice core.

There are systems that took part in our test session:

  • CPUs:
    • AMD Athlon 64 4000+ (Socket 939, 2.4GHz, 1024KB L2, CG core revision - ClawHammer);
    • AMD Athlon 64 3800+ (Socket 939, 2.4GHz, 512KB L2, CG core revision - Newcastle);
    • AMD Athlon 64 3500+ (Socket 939, 2.2GHz, 512KB L2, CG core revision - Newcastle);
    • AMD Athlon 64 3500+ (Socket 939, 2.2GHz, 512KB L2, D0 core revision - Winchester);
    • AMD Athlon 64 3800+ (Socket 939, 2.4GHz, 512KB L2, E3 core revision - Venice);
    • AMD Athlon 64 3500+ (Socket 939, 2.2GHz, 512KB L2, E3 core revision - Venice);
    • Intel Pentium 4 660 (LGA775, 3.6GHz, 2MB L2);
    • Intel Pentium 4 570 (LGA775, 3.8GHz, 1MB L2);
    • Intel Pentium 4 570 (LGA775, 3.6GHz, 1MB L2).
  • Mainboards:
    • ASUS P5AD2-E Premium (LGA775, i925XE Express);
    • EPoX 9NPA+ Ultra (Socket 939, NVIDIA nForce4 Ultra).
  • Memory:
    • 1024MB DDR400 SDRAM (Corsair CMX512-3200XLPRO, 2 x 512MB, 2-2-2-10);
    • 1024MB DDR2-533 SDRAM (OCZ PC2 4300, 2 x 512MB, 3-3-3-8).
  • Graphics card: PowerColor RADEON X800 XT (PCI-E x16).
  • HDD: Maxtor MaXLine III 250GB (SATA150).
  • OS: Microsoft Windows XP SP2.

The main goal of this test session is certainly to compare the performance of Athlon 64 processors based on different cores. However, we have also included the results for the top Intel Pentium 4 CPUs based on Prescott and Prescott 2M cores. This will allow us to get a better idea of the SSE3 instructions support efficiency in AMD CPUs.

So, let’s get started.

<<< Previous page Next page >>>

Discussion

Comments currently: 57
Discussion started: 04/04/05
View comments

Add your Comment

Name/Nickname
Your Comments
 

Category News

Category: CPU

Thursday, July 3, 2008

11:50 pm Via Nano Processors Set to Arrive in August or September. Via Technologies’ Nano Chips Delayed Again

Friday, June 27, 2008

6:59 pm AMD Readies K8-Class Processors for Low-Power Systems – Pictures. AMD’s Rival for Intel Atom Tested by Company’s Partners

Monday, June 23, 2008

11:00 pm Advanced Micro Devices Set to Compete with Intel Atom and Via Nano Chips – Rumours. AMD Reportedly Plans to Fight for Ultra Low-Cost Personal Computers Market with Sempron-Like Chips

Wednesday, June 18, 2008

7:12 pm Intel Atom Competitor from AMD: Rumors. Bet on AMD64?

Wednesday, June 11, 2008

5:31 pm AMD Denies Cancellation of New-Generation Dual-Core Chips. AMD Claims “Kuma” Gets Ready for Release

 
News Archive
All Latest News