X-bit labs

April Confrontation: AMD and Intel Start the Price War (page 10)

Category: CPU

by Ilya Gavrichenkov

[ 03/28/2007 | 05:18 PM ]

Video Encoding

Image and Video Editing

Final Rendering

I don’t think any commentary is necessary. The situation is almost identical on all charts. Intel processors on Core micro-architecture have much higher frequency reserves than their competitors on AMD K8 micro-architecture. So, Athlon 64 X2 processors selling for about $230 work at the maximum of their potential while the Core 2 Duo CPUs priced about the same allow over 45% of frequency increase as a result of overclocking. So, those overclockers who decide on Core 2 Duo, get much more opportunities to increase their systems performance, than those who pick Athlon 64 X2 processors. The diagrams above prove this point. Any chart you take demonstrates indisputable advantage of overclocked Core 2 Duo processors on Conroe or Allendale core over the competing Athlon 64 X2 on Windsor or Brisbane.