Bookmark and Share

Articles: CPU

Pages: [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 ]

Testbed and Methods

In this review we decided to figure out how fast can AMD Opteron run if it is used in a uniprocessor workstation. For our tests we assembled a system with ASUS SK8N mainboard and Opteron 144 processor working at the actual 1.8GHz frequency. Note that 1.8GHz is the today’s top core clock for AMD Opteron processors. That is why we decided to compare the performance of our today’s Opteron processor with that of top Pentium 4 and Athlon XP models.

The tests were run in Windows XP operation system, that is why w can’t talk about the effect achieved due to x86-64 technology of Opteron processors. Unfortunately, most professional applications work in this particular operation system, that is why we decided to refrain from installing any Linux closes on our testbeds.

Together with the tests in professional applications, we decided to check Opteron’s performance in classical tasks: gaming and office applications. In this case, the detailed study of Opteron performance will let us draw some preliminary conclusions about the performance of the upcoming Athlon 64 processor family intended for common desktop systems.

We tested Opteron with two and only one memory channels involved. Single-channel configurations, where Opteron doesn’t show everything it is capable of, are very interesting to us, because this way we can at least evaluate the performance of Athlon 64 processors, which will feature single-channel memory subsystem.

Processors

Opteron 144 (1.8GHz)

Intel Pentium 4 3.2GHz
(800MHz bus)

Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz
(800MHz bus)

AMD Athlon 3200+
(2.2GHz, 400MHz bus)

AMD Athlon 3000+
(2.17GHz, 333MHz bus)

Mainboards

ASUS SK8N

ASUS P4C800 Deluxe

ASUS A7N8X Deluxe 2.0

Memory

1024MB Registered DDR333 SDRAM (2 x 512MB)

1024MB DDR400 SDRAM (2 x 512 MB)

Graphics card

ATI RADEON 9700 PRO (Catalyst 3.4 driver)

HDD

Seagate Barracuda ATA IV, 80GB

Comments:

  • The memory was used in the fastest mode with the most aggressive timings set to 2-2-2-5.
  • We ran the tests in Windows XP SP1 operation system with the installed DirectX 9.0a.
Pages: [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 ]

Discussion

Comments currently: 48
Discussion started: 07/21/03 10:39:38 PM
Latest comment: 08/25/06 09:12:42 AM

View comments

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me