Articles: Graphics
 

Bookmark and Share

(14) 
Pages: [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 ]

Call of Duty 2

This test seems to be unable to load 48 pixel processors as is proved by the coinciding results of the Radeon X1800 XT and the Radeon X1900 XT. The GeForce 7900 GTX is much faster than the ASUS card and even allows playing the game comfortably in 1280x1024 with enabled FSAA and anisotropic filtering.

Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion

In the closed tunnels of the Oblivion that feature a lot of light sources and complex shadows, pixel shaders processing speed and Z processing efficiency matter the most. Although ASUS EAX1900XTX and GeForce 7900 GTX retain certain parity here, you should pay attention to the difference in minimal fps values. Thanks to twice as many pixel processors onboard, the ASUS card proves a better balanced solution in this test application than the Nvidia based product.

Of course, the open areas of Oblivion game with complex vegetation models may be pretty difficult even for the latest graphics accelerators. Only if we look at the average fps rate, we will be able to claim parity between ASUS EAX1900XTX and GeForce 7900 GTX. However, Nvidia’s flagship product cannot ensure smooth gaming experience with the minimal fps rate of less than 20 fps. So, the best solution for TES IV game remains Radeon X1900 XTX represented in our today’s review by the ASUS graphics card.

 
Pages: [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 ]

Discussion

Comments currently: 14
Discussion started: 07/23/06 09:13:32 PM
Latest comment: 08/25/06 07:57:54 AM

View comments

Add your Comment