Articles: Graphics
 

Bookmark and Share

(39) 
Pages: [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 ]

Performance in Synthetic Benchmarks

Futuremark 3DMark05 build 120

The factory overclocking puts e-GeForce 7900 GT CO SuperClocked only 28 points behind Radeon X1800 XT and far ahead the regular GeForce 7900 GT working at the nominal GPU and memory frequencies.

When we enabled FSAA in Game 1 test the EVGA solution manages to get slightly ahead of Radeon X1800 XT in 1280x1024 resolution and higher. However, it still cannot catch up with the faster rival such as Radeon X1900 XT and GeForce 7900 GTX.

Game 2 test doesn’t require high texturing speed, so e-GeForce 7900 GT CO SuperClocked doesn’t outperform Radeon X1800 XT in high resolutions anymore but runs neck and neck with it, because lightning and shadows processing as well as pixel and vertex processors performance are more important here. The last parameter is especially crucial since the scene has a lot of dynamically generated vegetation.

Despite the absolutely different theme of the Game 3 test, the results we see are practically the same as those of the Game 2 test: if the EVGA graphics card is a little bit ahead of Radeon X1800 XT, the advantage is small, no higher than 1-2fps. At the same time, it is impressively ahead of the standard GeForce 7900 GT: the advantage makes the good 30%!

So, the total score of EVGA e-GeForce 7900 GT CO SuperClocked graphics accelerator is absolutely justified by the individual Game tests results, even though the FSAA was enabled. As a rule, our hero performs as fast as Radeon X1800 XT in these tests.

 
Pages: [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 ]

Discussion

Comments currently: 39
Discussion started: 05/16/06 10:28:37 AM
Latest comment: 12/10/06 05:42:00 PM

View comments

Add your Comment