The Mass Market Warrior: ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT GDDR4 Review. Page 10
[09/28/2007 10:56 PM | Graphics]
by Alexey Stepin , Yaroslav Lyssenko, Anton Shilov
We have already reviewed new Radeon HD graphics architecture before, but at that time we only took a closer look at the top Radeon HD 2900 XT model, while more mainstream solutions didn’t get covered because they were scheduled to start selling a little later. Finally, mass Radeon HD saw the light of day and today we are going to check out one of them: Radeon HD 2600 XT.
F.E.A.R. Extraction Point
The Radeon HD 2600 XT isn’t brilliant in F.E.A.R., either, being slower than the Radeon X1950 Pro and the GeForce 8600 GTS in average performance and far slower than the GeForce 8600 GT in terms of minimum speed. The best it can do is 26fps with a minimum of only 7fps at 1280x1024. So, if you have at least a Radeon X1650 XT in your system, don’t hurry up to replace it with a Radeon HD 2600 XT.
Comments currently: 26
Discussion started: 09/29/07 08:17:58 PM
Latest comment: 03/07/08 08:08:04 PM
Add your Comment
Enter your username and e-mail address. Password will be sent to you.