Real-time Pricing and Availability:
ASUS EAH6870 DC/2DI2S/1GD5 AMD Radeon HD 6870 1GB GDDR5 Video Card with Eyefinity - EAH6870DC/2DI2S/1GD5 graphic cards eah6870 dc/2di2s/1gd5 eah6870d2di2s1g graphics express 2.1 sdram 2560 1600
  • - $189.99

Articles: Graphics
 

Bookmark and Share

(7) 
Pages: [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 ]

Video Playback

Considering its extremely low idle power consumption and modest power requirements under load, the ATI Radeon HD 5770 seems to be an ideal choice for HTPCs. In this section we will compare the ATI Radeon HD 5770 against its rivals in terms of high-definition video playback in the Microsoft Windows 7 environment. (In this section of this article we will try to compare ATI Radeon HD 5770 against the rivals in terms of high-definition video playback in Microsoft Windows 7 operating system).

Video Playback Benchmarking Testbed and Methods

We are going to investigate the decoding performance and playback quality of our today’s testing participants on the following platform:

  • Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 CPU (3.16GHz, 6MB cache, 1333MHz PSB);
  • Gigabyte EG45M-DS2H mainboard (Intel G45 chipset);
  • OCZ Technology PC2-8500 memory (2x1GB, 1066MHz, 5-5-5-15, 2T);
  • Western Digital HDD (640GB, SATA-150, 16MB buffer);
  • Antec Fusion 430W chassis;
  • Samsung 244T monitor (24”, 1920x1200@60Hz max resolution);
  • LG GGC-H20L optical drive (Blu-ray, HD DVD, DVD);
  • ATI Catalyst 9.10 for ATI Radeon;
  • ATI Catalyst version 8.66.6_Beta2 for ATI Radeon HD 5700;
  • Nvidia ForceWare 191.07 for Nvidia GeForce;
  • CyberLink PowerDVD 9;
  • Microsoft Windows 7 64-bit;
  • Microsoft Windows Performance Monitor.

We also used the following additional testbed:

  • Intel Core 2 Duo X6800 CPU (2.93GHz, 4MB cache, 1066MHz PSB)
  • Asus P5Q Pro mainboard (Intel P45)
  • OCZ Technology PC2-8500 memory (2x1 GB, 1066 MHz, 5-5-5-15, 2T)
  • Microsoft Windows Vista 64-bit

The following graphics cards and integrated graphics processors took part in our tests:

  • ATI Radeon HD 5770
  • ATI Radeon HD 5750
  • ATI Radeon HD 4850
  • ATI Radeon HD 4770
  • ATI Radeon HD 4670
  • ATI Radeon HD 4550
  • Nvidia GeForce GTS 250/9800 GTX
  • Nvidia GeForce GT 240/9800 GT
  • Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT

We used the following tools to estimate the video playback quality in standard (SD) and high-definition (HD) resolutions:

  • Silicon Optix HQV Benchmark
  • Silicon Optix HQV HD Benchmark

The driver settings remained the same. However, according to the HQV HD suite requirements, the noise suppression and detail levels for Nvidia GeForce graphics cards were set to the maximums.

Unfortunately, Windows 7 doesn’t support HD DVD playback using CyberLink PowerDVD player. That is why we used an additional testbed with Windows Vista OS and traditional HQV HD test to estimate the HD playback quality.  Moreover, since absolutely all graphics accelerators participating in our today’s test session demonstrate extremely low results in the HQV test, we also estimated the DVD playback quality in Windows Vista.  As a result, you can see the results obtained at different time, on different computer systems and with different drivers on the diagrams. Although in this case you can argue about the fairness of such comparison, since the HQV HD results may vary depending on the driver version, we believe that by providing the HQV HD data we show the maximum potential of the participating GPUs very well.

Since the owners of high-end sound systems will be extremely interested in the results of loseless threads playback, we also included DTS-HD Master Audio and Dolby Digital TrueHD (where available) in order to increase the CPU load in all played movie fragments.

Keeping in mind that all tests are run under Windows 7/Windows Vista OS without disabling background services, the CPU utilization peaks shouldn’t be regarded as critical. It is much more important how much time it takes the CPU on average to complete the task. Note that the CPU utilization may vary. Therefore, 1-2% difference is not indicative of any advantage of a certain graphics accelerator over the competitor.

To estimate the CPU utilization during full-HD video playback (1920x1080) and full-HD video with enabled “picture-in-picture” (PiP) or Bonus View (according to Blu-ray disc Association classification) feature, we used the following movies:

  • Alien Vs. Predator: MPEG2 HD, chapter 18
  • Constantine: VC1, picture-in-picture, chapter 25
  • Dark Knight: VC1, chapter 1 (credits not included into the test sequence)
  • Death Race: MPEG4-AVC/H.264, picture-in-picture, chapter 14
  • The Day After Tomorrow: MPEG4-AVC/H264, chapter 14

Like in a number of our previous articles, we decided to give up tests with free online media content, because its decoding is currently not supported by existing commercial software.

 
Pages: [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 ]

Discussion

Comments currently: 7
Discussion started: 11/05/09 02:19:18 PM
Latest comment: 01/05/10 10:18:53 PM

View comments

Add your Comment

[Login] [Forgot password?] [Registration]