Radeon without Antidote: Sapphire Toxic Radeon X1900 XTX Review. Page 18

[04/27/2006 04:15 PM | Graphics]
by Anton Shilov , Alexey Stepin

The winter, which brought us quite a lot of new products from ATI, such as the Radeon X1900 and the CrossFire Xpress 3200, is over, but there is one final blizzard coming to a retail outlet near you: the Sapphire’s Toxic Radeon X1900 XTX. The graphics card that features liquid-cooling and increased clock-speeds promises silent operation amid extreme performance. We decided to take a look at this product!

Pages: [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 ]

Performance in Semi-Synthetic Benchmarks

Aquamark3

Aquamark3 is a previous-generation graphics benchmark because it has a minimum of version 2.0 shaders, using instead version 1.1 and, less often, version 1.4 pixel shaders. Anyway, the Sapphire Toxic X1900 XTX isn’t much slower than the GeForce 7900 GTX – there’s a difference of only 10% between them in 1600x1200.

< Previous Page | Next Page >

Pages: [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 ]

Discussion

Comments currently: 18
Discussion started: 04/27/06 06:08:58 PM
Latest comment: 08/25/06 07:37:34 AM

View comments

Real-time Pricing and Availability:

Radeon without Antidote: Sapphire Toxic Radeon X1900 XTX Review. Page 18

Performance in Semi-Synthetic Benchmarks

Aquamark3

Discussion

Preview

Add your Comment

Our Sponsors