Performance
ABIT offers different performance presets with its i865PE and i875P mainboards, so, I decided to check if these presets actually increase performance and if they do, how much speed they can add.
Configuration of the system I benchmarked is as follows:
- Intel Pentium 4 2.40C, 800MHz Quad Pumped Bus, HyperThreading;
- ABIT IC7 mainboard (i875P);
- 512MB PC3200 DDR SDRAM (2-3-3-5), Corsair XMS3200;
- ATI RADEON 9800 PRO graphics card;
- Seagate HDD 7200.7, 8MB cache, Serial ATA-150;
- Creative Soundblaster Live! 1024 sound card;
- Microsoft Windows XP SP1;
- ATI CATALYST 3.5 drivers.
ABIT claims that the “F1” preset is the fastest and is intended for hardcore gamers who want to have wicked performance in their games. Well, our testing reveals a bit different picture:
ABIT IC7 Performance Tweaking Capabilities | ||||
Intel Pentium 4 2.40C, 512MB DDR SDRAM (2-3-3-5), ATI RADEON 9800 PRO | ||||
| Auto | Turbo | Street Racer | F1 |
Synthetic Benchmarks | ||||
SiSoft Sandra 2002, RAM Bandwidth (Int/Float) | 4704/4717 | 4784/4782 | 4830/4828 | 4799/4806 |
PCMark2002, Memory score | 8370 | 8557 | 9106 | 8856 |
PCMark2002, CPU Score | 5970 | 5969 | 5994 | 5990 |
3DMark2001 SE, Default | 15335 | 15530 | 15777 | 15836 |
3DMark03 , Default | 5573 | 5584 | 5598 | 5592 |
3DMark03, CPU Score | 567 | 580 | 587 | 580 |
Gaming Benchmarks | ||||
Unreal Tournament 2003, flyby CITADEL, 640x480x32 | 111.4 | 113.0 | 114.3 | 113.7 |
Unreal Tournament 2003, flyby CITADEL, 1024x768x32 | 112.1 | 113.3 | 114.7 | 114.2 |
Unreal Tournament 2003, botmatch Antalus, 640x480x32 | 47.5 | 48.4 | 48.9 | 48 |
Unreal Tournament 2003, botmatch Antalus, 1024x768x32 | 47.8 | 47.6 | 48.2 | 48.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Quake III Arena, demo-four, 640x480x32 | 230.1 | 233.3 | 236.5 | 235.9 |
Quake III Arena, demo-four, 1024x768x32 | 226.7 | 230.2 | 233.8 | 232.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
RTCW, Checkpoint, 640x480x32 | 137.4 | 139.6 | 141.2 | 141.7 |
RTCW, Checkpoint, 1024x768x32 | 137.6 | 139.1 | 141.3 | 140.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Serious Sam TSE, The Grand Cathedral, 640x480x32 | 102.2 | 104.8 | 105.4 | 105.8 |
Serious Sam TSE, The Grand Cathedral, 1024x768x32 | 98.4 | 102.1 | 103.1 | 104 |
As we all can see now, the fastest performance preset of ABIT IC7 is actually “Street Racer”, not “F1”. Although the latter wins in certain cases, the former clearly holds the performance crown here. I want to emphasize that I did not experience any stability issues with “Street Racer” mode in any cases. The only condition here is that you need to use quality memory modules, as well as quality power supply unit and well-cooled PC case. Otherwise, no one guarantees that everything will work as smoothly, as in my case. Moreover, real-world applications hardly benefit from such tuning of up-to-date Intel Pentium 4-based systems.
Conclusion
We have reviewed a not very expensive mainboard based on i875P chipset designed for high-end desktops and workstations. The mainboard pleased us with great stability and high performance. ABIT’s traditional overclocking and tuning capabilities are available on the IC7 mainboard, as a result, the solution can eventually become popular among overclockers. If you are not going to overclock and just want to have an up-to-date higher-end mainboard, ABIT IC7 is also a good buy, I believe, however, it still has a number of disadvantages you have to keep in mind.
Highs:
- High stability;
- Excellent overclocking and tuning options;
- AGP Pro 50 support;
- USB 2.0 and IEEE1394 support;
- Integrated 6-channel audio;
- Serial ATA-150 RAID support;
- Relatively low cost;
- Stylish package.
Lows:
- PCB layout has a lot of drawbacks;
- Extremely loud active MCH cooling system;
- Only 5 PCI slots;
- No integrated Ethernet controller at all;
- Only two Serial ATA-150 ports;
- AC’97 audio-solution, a PCI solution would definitely be a bit better;
- Not rich product bundle.



