Search<%BANNER[mem130]%>
<%BANNER[left_130x300]%>
<%BANNER[left_130x130_2]%>
InformationX-bit Labs for mobile users! Do not forget that we are running a special version of X-bit Labs web-site for users of mobile and handheld devices: http://pda.xbitlabs.com. Check out our news and articles from smartphones and PDAs to be always updated on the latest computer and technology news. <%BANNER[right_130x600]%>
|
<%BANNER[top_768x90]%>
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
<%BANNER[banner_468x60]%>
Articles: Memory
DDR3-1600 SDRAM: Technological Breakthrough or Marketing Trick? (page 5)Category: Memory [ 08/21/2007 | 06:54 PM ] Testbed and MethodsNow that we have discussed in detail our testing participants – the new overclocker DDR3-1333 and DDR3-1600 memory kits – it is high time we turned to discussing their practical performance in different real applications. Will the above described solutions be able to offer us a higher level of performance than the DDR2 SDRAM modules? – This is the primary question we need to answer by the end of our test session. As we have already said before, we can only test DDR3-1600 in overclocked Intel P35 Express based systems with FSB running at increased frequency (so far this is the only chipset supporting DDR3 SDRAM). For our test session we set the FSB at 400MHz. With different dividers this configuration allows setting the memory frequency at 1000, 1200, 1333 and 1600MHz, which will do just fine for our comparison of DDR2 and DDR3 memory subsystems performance. So, the test processor was overclocked to 3.6GHz obtained as 9 x 400MHz. We tested DDR3 SDRAM in the above described system based on Asus Blitz Extreme mainboard. The DDR2 SDRAM performance was measured in a similar system built on Asus P5K Deluxe mainboard. We compared the performance of DDR3-1333 and DDR3-1600 against that of overclocker DDR2-1000 SDRAM working with 4-4-4-12 timings and DDR2-1200 SDRAM with 5-5-5-15 timings. The complete list of memory modules that took part in our test session is provided in the table below together with the links to screenshots from diagnostic utilities showing all the timings settings, including the secondary ones. Note that all secondary parameter settings were left in Auto on purpose.
As for other components that we used during our tests, here is the list for your reference:
<%BANNER[banner_468x30]%>
|
Category NewsCategory: Memory Monday, July 21, 20082:13 pm OCZ Technology Unveils First “Fatal1ty” Memory Modules. OCZ Announces Breed of “Fatal1ty” Memory Modules Thursday, July 17, 20088:00 pm Samsung and Sun Claim that Newly Developed Flash Memory for Servers Will Live Longer than Data Processing Servers. Samsung and Sun Develop Ultra Durable Memory for Server Solid State Drives Friday, July 11, 20089:20 pm Rambus Accuses Nvidia of Patent Infringement. Rambus Sues Nvidia of Patent Infringement Thursday, June 26, 200812:40 pm OCZ Technology Set to Manufacture Fatal1ty-Branded Devices. OCZ Plans to Attract Gamers with Fatal1ty Brand Name Thursday, June 19, 20081:12 pm JEDEC Lowers the Power for DDR3. DDR3L to Work at 1.35V All Latest News <%BANNER[right_130x130_1]%>
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
<%BANNER[foot_728x90]%> | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||