<%BANNER[top_768x90]%>
<%BANNER[banner_468x60_h]%>
<%BANNER[article]%>

Articles: Mobile

<%BANNER[fp_160x600_r_1]%>
Pages: [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 ]

Things are rather strange in Quake 3, too: in the first test mode (640x480; 16 bit; Lighting:Vertex; Detail:Low; Texture Quality:16 bit; Texture Filter:Bilinear) the performance of the ASUS A4S00K is higher than that of the Acer Ferrari 3200 by 17 percent. In the second mode (1024x768; 32 bit; Lighting:Lightmap; Detail:High; Texture Quality:32 bit; Texture Filter:Trilinear) their results are similar as you can see from the next table:

The following diagram is based on the data from the table:

The results of the tests are quite mysterious - the difference is too big for two so similar configurations!

Next, I measured the battery run-down time of the notebooks with the help of Battery Eater Pro 2.30 at the highest and lowest screen brightness settings, and in three test modes:

  • Classical - the system bears the maximum load;
  • Reader's test;
  • DVD viewing test.

The results of the test are presented below:

I won't call that a record-breaking performance, but after all these are not small sub-notebooks specifically targeted at a longest possible battery life time.

Pages: [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 ]

<%BANNER[banner_468x60_f]%>

Discussion

Comments currently: 13
Discussion started: 01/21/05 04:18:41 PM
Latest comment: 03/13/07 01:59:50 PM

View comments

You must log in to add comments.
Unfortunately, the old registrations do not work anymore. Please register again. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me