Articles: Mobile
 

Bookmark and Share

(6) 
Pages: [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 ]

SYSMark 2004 SE is intended to reveal a system’s performance under different types of load. It simulates a user who is solving practical tasks in a few popular applications. Multi-threading is taken into account. The benchmark issues a few ratings that are indicative of the system performance under different loads. SYSMark 2004 SE is mainly positioned as a tool for testing desktop systems and includes applications that are not often run on mobile computers. That’s why the results for each test load are shown separately:

The 3D Creation script simulates a user who is rendering an image into a BMP-file in 3ds max 5.1 and is also working on web-pages in Dreamweaver MX. After these operations are done, a 3D animation is created in a vector graphics format.

The Intel Celeron M 520 finds it difficult to compete with the Intel Pentium Dual-Core T2060. On the other hand, the Celeron is faster than the dual-core Pentium in the battery mode as it doesn’t use any power-saving measures. Well, it’s clear that the higher performance of the Celeron M is achieved by spending more power.

The 2D Creation script simulates a user creating a video out of a few RAW-format fragments and audio tracks in Premier 6.5. Waiting for the operation to complete, the user is also modifying an image in Photoshop 7.01 and then saves it to the hard disk. When the video clip is ready, the user edits it and adds special effects in After Effects 5.5.

Backed up by a stronger system configuration, the Merom is about as fast as the ASUS A6Rp in the 2D Creation test.

The next test simulates the work routines of a professional web-master. The user unzips the content of a website while using Flash MX to open an exported 3D vector graphics clip. Then the user modifies it by including more pictures and optimizes it for faster animation. The resulting clip with special effects is compressed with Windows Media Encoder 9 to be broadcast via the Internet. Next, the website is compiled in Dreamweaver MX while the system is being scanned for viruses with VirusScan 7.0 in the background.

The Celeron M520 loses its ground in this test even if it is compared with the cheapest dual-core CPU based on an older core.

The next script simulates an ordinary user who’s receiving a letter with a .zip attachment in Outlook 2002. While the received files are being scanned for viruses with VirusScan 7.0, the user looks through his e-mail, enters some comments into the Outlook calendar, and then opens a corporate website and some documents with Internet Explorer 6.0.

The X51R seems to have the same communicational capabilities as its opponent and the differences between the two CPUs do not count here.

In the Document Creation script the user is editing text in Word 2002 and is also using Dragon NaturallySpeaking to convert an audio file into a text document. This text document is then converted into PDF format with Acrobat 5.0.5. And finally, the document is employed in a PowerPoint 2002 presentation.

The Merom shows itself a good CPU for office applications, being just a little slower than the Pentium Dual-Core T2060.

The final script from SYSMark 2004 SE includes the following: the user opens a database in Access 2002 and creates a few queries. Documents are archived with WinZip 8.1. The results of the queries are exported into Excel 2002 and are used to construct a diagram.

The X51R is even ahead of the dual-core notebook in the final test from SYSmark 2004 SE, showing a more advanced architecture coupled with an improved overall configuration. Like in the previous applications, its results do not depend on the power source whether it is the battery or the power mains.

 
Pages: [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 ]

Discussion

Comments currently: 6
Discussion started: 11/16/07 02:26:02 PM
Latest comment: 10/27/12 04:57:22 AM

View comments

Add your Comment