Search<%BANNER[left_130x130_1]%>
<%BANNER[left_130x300]%>
<%BANNER[left_130x130_2]%>
InformationX-bit Labs for mobile users! Do not forget that we are running a special version of X-bit Labs web-site for users of mobile and handheld devices: http://pda.xbitlabs.com. Check out our news and articles from smartphones and PDAs to be always updated on the latest computer and technology news. <%BANNER[right_130x600]%>
|
<%BANNER[top_768x90]%>
|
|
|
<%BANNER[banner_468x60]%>
Articles: Storage
Three USB 2.0 Flash Drives with 1GB Storage Capacity (page 4)Category: Storage [ 10/28/2003 | 11:35 PM ] Performance in FC-TestFile Copy test was used to measure how long it will take the drive to create a 1024KB file, how fast it will then read it and copy onto the system HDD and back.
A-Data Agenie and Super Talent Flash pen Drive perform almost equally fast when creating the file. A-Data Speed Drive lags noticeably behind them. The same situation repeats when we do the reading: A-Data Speed Drive again falls behind the leaders. When we do the file copy to the HDD, the gap between the leaders and the third testing participant turns smaller. However, when we copy the file from the HDD back to the flash drive, A-Data Speed Drive finally wins. The second one appears Super Talent Flash Pen Drive and the last one comes A-Data Agenie. Performance in IOMark and HDTachWith the help of HDTach utility we measured the access time. IOMark tool was used to measure the read and write speeds. The graphs below represent the peak linear read and write speeds for our testing participants: A-Data Agenie A-Data Speed Drive Super Talent Flash Pen Drive
The access time appeared almost identical by A-Data Agenie and Super Talent Flash Pen Drive. The second A-Data device, Speed Drive, shows stably lower results, and to tell the truth I do not know what caused this drastic difference in performance. I even ran all tests anew, but the results repeated. All the other numbers are more or less close. Only the linear writing of the Super Talent Flash Pen Drive appeared slower than that of the competitors. ConclusionSo, we tested three 1GB compact flash drives in order to find out, which of them is the fastest. In fact, I cannot say that any of them is much faster than the others. The numeric results are pretty even and do not allow us to draw a conclusion like that. The only exception is Sandra benchmark where the performance difference is very significant, and HDTach with its access time measurements. In the first case, it is probably the used algorithm that we should blame, while the reasons for the low performance in the second case remained unknown. As you can see, the three devices cost pretty different money: the difference makes about $40. therefore, if you care about the price in the first place, then you should go for Super Talent Flash product. If you value convenient use, you’d better decide on a device from A-Data, which are accompanied with software CDs, USB cables and neck bands. However, you will have to pay extra for the additional accessories, don’t forget about it. <%BANNER[banner_468x30]%>
Article Rating |
Category NewsCategory: Storage Wednesday, July 23, 20089:58 pm Western Digital Releases VelociRaptor for Enterprises. WD Launches Enterprise Version of VelociRaptor 12:29 pm SanDisk Blames Windows Vista for Low Performance of Solid State Drives. SanDisk: Vista Is Not Optimized for Flash Memory Solid State Disk Friday, July 18, 20086:03 am Micron and Seagate to Lead Solid State Drive Standardization Efforts at JEDEC. JEDEC Announces Dedicated Subcommittee to Set Standards for SSDs Friday, July 11, 20089:50 pm Seagate Unleashes World's First 1.5TB Hard Disk Drives. Seagate Increases Hard Drive Capacity to 1500GB Thursday, July 10, 20082:03 pm Samsung Starts Volume Production of 128GB Solid State Drives. Samsung Initiates Mass Production of Relatively Affordable 128GB SSDs All Latest News <%BANNER[right_130x130_1]%>
|
|
<%BANNER[foot_728x90]%> | ||




