<%BANNER[top_768x90]%>
<%BANNER[banner_468x60_h]%>
<%BANNER[article]%>

Articles: Storage

Pages: [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 ]

Samsung

Let’s discuss the Samsung gang now.

They perform like a team of synchronized swimmers. Irrespective of the buffer size and interface, they score much the same results.

It’s roughly the same under the 16-requests load; only the SATA drive is somewhat faster at reading and slower at writing.

There’re no big changes at the maximum load, either. The SP1604N has a small advantage working with a mixed request stream, but joined the rest of the group at 100% reads and 100% writes.

Pages: [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 ]

<%BANNER[banner_468x60_f]%>

Discussion

Comments currently: 27
Discussion started: 07/21/04 08:03:42 AM
Latest comment: 10/14/07 10:28:31 AM

View comments

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me