Performance in FC-Test
Now let’s have a look at the performance of our testing participants in the already traditional FC-Test developed for automatic time measurements during file copy operations in different patterns:




Here FC-Test is surprisingly similar to WinBench99. The “professional” models with large cache-buffer are ahead. Although 6Y120P0-80 managed to stand out here as well, having performed slower than 6Y120P0-60 (the solution with less dense platters) when creating multiple small files. As in Intel IOMeter, the situation improves as soon as we start working with large files and sequential access.



