Information

X-bit Labs for mobile users! Do not forget that we are running a special version of X-bit Labs web-site for users of mobile and handheld devices: http://pda.xbitlabs.com. Check out our news and articles from smartphones and PDAs to be always updated on the latest computer and technology news.

 

Articles: Storage

MSI DR16-B2 DVD±RW Dual Layer Burner: Repeated Success or New Heights? (page 10)


Category: Storage

by Vasily Melnik

[ 09/27/2005 | 09:43 PM ]


Real-time Pricing and Availability:

MSI DR16-B DVD±RW Dual Layer Burner Products

Pages : 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20

Performance during Damaged CD-ROM Disc Reading

The CD-related part of the review is traditionally concluded with a test of the error-correction logic of the drive. We use a low-quality, scratched CD-ROM for that.

Reading a severely damaged CD-ROM disc

MSI DR16-B2

BenQ DW1620

The MSI DR16-B2 took 3 minutes and 32 seconds to read the whole disc; the BenQ DW1620 did the same in 3 minutes and 41 seconds. In other words, the difference in time between these two drives is negligibly small. The number of unread blocks is the same in both cases (4 blocks). As a result, I can state that the drives have absolutely identical optical systems as well as error-correction algorithms.

The CD-related part of the review being over, the rest of it will be mostly dedicated to DVD media.

Performance during DVD Media Reading

Reading single- and dual-layer molded DVD-ROM discs

MSI DR16-B2

BenQ DW1620

The MSI drive had some problems at reading the single-layer molded DVD Video disc. Starting from the second third of the disc, the speed of the drive was fluctuating, the fluctuation being stronger on the outermost tracks. The BenQ also faltered once when it dropped its read speed down suddenly, but the drive then quickly restored its speed and finished the test without errors. The difference between the two drives is 22 seconds, but the fact that the read speed of the MSI drive is unstable is much more disturbing than those extra 20 seconds.

Both drives read the dual-layer medium with ease, producing straight and tidy graphs, without any noticeable slowdowns. And they took exactly the same amount of time – to a second – to read the whole dual-layer disc.

<<< Previous page Next page >>>

Discussion

Comments currently: 24
Discussion started: 09/29/05
View comments

Add your Comment

Name/Nickname
Your Comments
 

Category News

Category: Storage

Wednesday, July 23, 2008

9:58 pm Western Digital Releases VelociRaptor for Enterprises. WD Launches Enterprise Version of VelociRaptor

12:29 pm SanDisk Blames Windows Vista for Low Performance of Solid State Drives. SanDisk: Vista Is Not Optimized for Flash Memory Solid State Disk

Friday, July 18, 2008

6:03 am Micron and Seagate to Lead Solid State Drive Standardization Efforts at JEDEC. JEDEC Announces Dedicated Subcommittee to Set Standards for SSDs

Friday, July 11, 2008

9:50 pm Seagate Unleashes World's First 1.5TB Hard Disk Drives. Seagate Increases Hard Drive Capacity to 1500GB

Thursday, July 10, 2008

2:03 pm Samsung Starts Volume Production of 128GB Solid State Drives. Samsung Initiates Mass Production of Relatively Affordable 128GB SSDs

 
News Archive
All Latest News