Articles: Storage
 

Bookmark and Share

(7) 
Pages: [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 ]

 

Futuremark PCMark 7

The popular PCMark 7 contains an individual disk subsystem benchmark. It is not a synthetic test, but is based on real-life applications. This benchmark reproduces typical disk usage scenarios and measures how fast they are completed in popular applications. Moreover, the disk access commands are not executed as a steady uninterrupted flow, but in a more realistic manner – with certain pauses caused by the need to process the data. The benchmark generates an overall disk subsystem performance rating as well as speed readings in MB/s in individual usage scenarios. Note that the absolute speed in these scenarios is not too high because of the above mentioned pauses between individual input/output operations. In other words, PCMark 7 shows you the speed of the disk subsystem from the application’s point of view. Numbers like that show us not only the pure performance of an SSD, but mostly how big of a performance gain a certain SSD can guarantee in real life.

We ran PCMark 7 on “steady” SSDs, which is what they are going to be in actual computer systems most of the time. Their performance in this case is affected not only by their controller or flash memory speed but also by the efficiency of their internal algorithms that fight performance degradation.

Against our expectations, Futuremark PCMark 7 gives the SanDisk Extreme a rather low performance score. The SSD is inferior to the Mushkin Chronos Deluxe as well as to the Corsair Force GT, yet it is still in the top part of the diagram and looks good compared to SSDs based on other platforms.

Now let’s check out the individual tests to get a more detailed picture of what our SSDs are capable of under various types of operational load:

The SanDisk Extreme performs consistently throughout all of the PCMark 7 traces. It can’t win any of them. Considering that we test SSDs in their steady state, this must be due to the abovementioned problem with the TRIM command implementation.

 
Pages: [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 ]

Discussion

Comments currently: 7
Discussion started: 08/20/12 06:03:24 PM
Latest comment: 01/17/13 07:18:00 AM

View comments

Add your Comment