<%BANNER[top_768x90]%>
<%BANNER[banner_468x60_h]%>
<%BANNER[article]%>

Articles: Video

Real-time Pricing and Availability:
ATI RADEON® X1800 XT, (512 MB) PCI Express Video Card Products

<%BANNER[fp_160x600_r_1]%>
Pages: [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 ]

The memory subsystem performance is not that important in the second 3DMark05 test, so the ASUS EAX1800XT TOP manages to keep up the tempo of the GeForce 7800 GTX 512 even in the most resource-consuming modes. The Radeon X1900 XT still has the best results among the graphics cards included in this test session.

It’s all generally the same in the third test, although the GeForce 7800 GTX 512 enjoys a certain advantage. Although this test uses textures-heavy shaders, the Radeon X1900 XT beats the Radeon X1800 XT as well as the GeForce 7800 GTX 512; the GeForce is getting somewhat closer to the leader in the “eye candy” mode.

The results of the ASUS EAX1800XT TOP in the individual 3DMark05 tests quite agree with the overall result: this solution is a little faster than the Radeon X1800 XT, but slower than the Radeon X1900 XT. The ASUS is about as fast as the GeForce 7800 GTX 512 in this benchmark.

Pages: [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 ]

<%BANNER[banner_468x60_f]%>

Discussion

Comments currently: 24
Discussion started: 04/12/06 05:42:04 PM
Latest comment: 04/18/08 01:15:16 AM

View comments

You must log in to add comments.
Unfortunately, the old registrations do not work anymore. Please register again. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me