<%BANNER[top_768x90]%>
<%BANNER[banner_468x60_h]%>
<%BANNER[article]%>

Articles: Video

<%BANNER[fp_160x600_r_1]%>
Pages: [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 ]

Far Cry

The Pier map depends on the performance of the whole system, but it anyway puts the graphics cards with a high pixel shader performance on top. Particularly, the RADEON X800 PRO is faster than the GeForce 6800 GT in low resolutions. As for the ASUS N6600 GT/TD, it works like the RADEON 9800 XT at the default frequencies. When overclocked, it almost equals the GeForce 6800.

The ASUS N6600 GT/TD is slightly behind the RADEON 9800 XT – by no more than 9-10%. Overclocking helps the ASUS reach the level of the GeForce 6800 again.

The demo record on the Research map abounds in light sources and thus requires multi-pass rendering. It means graphics processors that support long shaders have an advantage here since processing more light sources in a single pass reduces the total number of passes required to construct the scene. This advantage shows up in the results: the N6600 GT/TD is more than 20% ahead of the RADEON 9800 XT.

The N6600 GT/TD loses its position in the “eye candy” mode: its performance falls to the level of the RADEON 9800 XT as soon as 1280x1024 resolution and goes lower still in 1600x1200. Overclocking amends the situation somewhat: at 560/1040MHz frequencies the N6600 GT/TD is successfully competing with the RADEON 9800 XT even in the highest resolutions.

Pages: [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 ]

<%BANNER[banner_468x60_f]%>

Discussion

Comments currently: 3
Discussion started: 05/19/05 07:10:15 AM
Latest comment: 08/30/05 09:22:26 AM

View comments

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me