<%BANNER[top_768x90]%>
<%BANNER[banner_468x60_h]%>
<%BANNER[article]%>

Articles: Video

<%BANNER[fp_160x600_r_1]%>
Pages: [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 ]

The second game test is actually a 3D shooter, and the advantages of faster memory are not obvious until we get to high resolutions.

In the second gaming test when we enable FSAA and anisotropic filtering we can also notice the difference between the two CATALYST driver versions. Of course, the demonstrated numbers are not very high in both cases, but the card with CATALYST 4.1 is evidently lagging behind. As for the faster memory, it does improve the performance of the card, despite the overall low performance. However, the three last gaming 3DMark03 tests have never been remarkable for high FPS rates.

Pages: [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 ]

<%BANNER[banner_468x60_f]%>

Discussion

Comments currently: 29
Discussion started: 02/17/04 08:10:27 AM
Latest comment: 04/24/06 05:30:03 AM

View comments

You must log in to add comments.
Unfortunately, the old registrations do not work anymore. Please register again. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me