Information

X-bit Labs for mobile users! Do not forget that we are running a special version of X-bit Labs web-site for users of mobile and handheld devices: http://pda.xbitlabs.com. Check out our news and articles from smartphones and PDAs to be always updated on the latest computer and technology news.

 

Articles: Video

GeForce 7950 GT: 256MB or 512MB? Foxconn and Gigabyte Graphics Cards Review


Category: Video

by Alexey Stepin , Yaroslav Lyssenko

[ 02/08/2007 | 02:57 PM ]

What is the most optimal size of onboard graphics memory? It is one of the most frequently asked questions among gaming fans. Today when the memory has hit 728MB already and will eventually approach 1GB, this question regains its acuteness. We will try to find out if 512MB of memory is really needed for today’s graphics cards or the slightly higher working frequencies of the solution with only 256MB onboard will be a better choice.


Table of contents:


Pages : 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20

The amount of memory a graphics card has on board is one of its main parameters along with the frequencies of the memory and GPU chips. At one time this parameter even determined which maximum resolution and color depth a graphics card could support in 2D applications. Thus, graphics cards with 1MB of memory could not use 32-bit color depth at all and supported 24-bit color depth in 640x480 resolution only. As the era of 3D games dawned, graphics memory also began to be used for storing textures and, eventually, other kinds of data, too.

<%BANNER[article]%>

Graphics processors and games evolving, the amount of data to be stored in the graphics card’s memory was ever increasing, and the manufacturers had to install more memory on their products. This made the end product more expensive, and an attempt to use system memory for storing textures was made. Thus, the i740 graphics chip, developed by Intel, would use the onboard memory only as a frame buffer while textures were stored in system memory and accessed by means of the GART mechanism (Graphics Address Remapping Table) described in the AGP bus specification.

However, AGP texturing never really took off because memory they then installed on graphics cards was already superior to system memory in speed characteristics whereas the storing of graphics data, even if some portion of them, in system memory had a very negative effect on the overall performance. As a result, the manufacturers returned to their earlier tactics and renewed the “weapons race”. Graphics cards with 64, 128 and 256MB of graphics memory appeared on the market eventually. Some unconscientious manufacturers used to play a nasty trick then: they put a lot of slow memory on inexpensive graphics cards and emphasized the amount of memory in the advertisements. This didn’t provide any real benefits, but could even lead to a performance hit if the memory clock rate was too low. Having purchased such a product with an impressive number on the box, the user would find out that it wasn’t nearly as fast as expected.

But as for top-end graphics cards with 128 or even 256MB of high-speed memory, the performance gain could be small or lacking altogether with them because their memory was not used fully. This amount of memory, 256MB, became useful and even necessary only when the new generation of games arrived and when gamers began to play in high resolutions and with enabled full-screen antialiasing. Finally, we’ve come to what we have now.

Today, 128 megabytes of graphics memory is the bare minimum for a modern graphics card. This amount is typical of the most inexpensive products that are not actually intended for regular gaming. Graphics cards positioned as gaming products are equipped with at least 256 megabytes of GDDR2/GDDR3 memory. Top-performance solutions come with 512MB of GDDR3/GDDR4 and new-generation graphics cards can boast as much as 640 or even 768 megabytes of memory. Solutions with 1GB of memory on board are about to arrive, too. But do today’s games really need that much? Let’s try to check it out.

Next page >>>

Discussion

Comments currently: 16
Discussion started: 02/08/07
View comments

Add your Comment

Name/Nickname
Your Comments
 

Category News

Category: Video

Friday, July 25, 2008

12:31 pm Channel Vendors Demand Graphics Cards Suppliers to Recall Potentially Faulty Nvidia GeForce Graphics Cards. Resellers Want to Return Potentially Faulty Nvidia GeForce Graphics Boards to Makers

Thursday, July 17, 2008

5:48 am Microsoft Preps to Unveil DirectX 11 Features in Several Days. ATI, Nvidia, Microsoft to Discuss DirectX 11 Techniques at XNA, Siggraph

Wednesday, July 16, 2008

12:30 pm New Generation ATI Radeon for Mainstream, Mobile Markets are Ready. PCI-SIG Approves ATI RV730, M98-L, M96 Graphics Chips

7:22 am EVGA and XFX Reimburse Price Difference on GeForce GTX 200 after Price Collapse. EVGA and XFX to Return Money to GeForce GTX 200 Purchasers

Tuesday, July 15, 2008

4:23 pm Startup Promises to Revolutionize Multi-GPU Technology Early Next Year. LucidLogix Unveils Hydra Distributed Processing Engine

 
News Archive
All Latest News