Bookmark and Share

Articles: Video

Pages: [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 ]

The advantage of the WinFast A6600 GT over the RADEON 9800 XT is observable in all the resolutions of the second test, too.

The same it true for the “eye candy” mode with enabled full-screen anti-aliasing and anisotropic filtering.

The third test uses maximum-complexity pixel shaders, and there’s no doubt as to the winner. The WinFast A6600 GT TDH is 10-15% faster than its main competitor.

The Leadtek is the same 10% ahead of the RADEON 9800 XT in the “eye candy” mode, too. On the whole, like in 3DMark03, the Leadtek WinFast A6600 GT TDH gains a deserved victory over the RADEON 9800 XT, at least in the tested modes (i.e. without FSAA+AF modes in resolutions above 1024x768).

Pages: [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 ]

Discussion

Comments currently: 25
Discussion started: 05/12/05 06:43:46 AM
Latest comment: 12/18/07 10:51:46 AM

View comments

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me