Bookmark and Share

Articles: Video

Pages: [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 ]

The third test resembles the second one, so the above-described situation is repeated here.

Like in the previous case, the GammaChrome remains superior over the RADEON X600 PRO even with enabled full-screen anti-aliasing.

Despite its low pixel shader performance, the GammaChrome equals the RADEON X600 PRO in the fourth test.

The new graphics card cannot stand its ground in the “eye candy” mode: it is slower even than the RADEON X300.

But the scores are correct – the GammaChrome is better in three tests and performs as fast as the RADEON X600 PRO in the fourth test, so it deservedly has a higher total score.

Pages: [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 ]

Discussion

Comments currently: 21
Discussion started: 04/20/05 08:23:39 AM
Latest comment: 09/15/05 07:07:30 PM

View comments

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me