<%BANNER[top_768x90]%>
<%BANNER[left_160x600_1]%>
<%BANNER[banner_468x60_h]%>

Discussion

<%BANNER[fp_160x600_r_1]%>

Discussion on Article:
Advanced Micro Devices May Not Bring DDR2 Support in 2005.

Started by: Anemone | Date 01/17/05 06:14:54 PM
Comments: 3 | Last Comment:  01/18/05 03:41:28 AM

Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-2]

1. 
So much for the talk of "well when the memory hits a speed we find useful..." More like, "when we can actually get it to work and can implement it", which with AMD is almost always at least 1 year behind when they say they are "definitely coming out with it in month xx"

They've got a great chip but they've never yet managed to cure the delay factor in getting stuff out when they say they will.

[Posted by: Anemone | Date: 01/17/05 06:14:54 PM]
You must log in to reply
+ expand thread (1 answer)
2. 
I'm running DDR2 @ 3 2 2 latencies...

2 1gb sticks as well something else that DDR1 can't do at speed


But of course you are right in that the A64 doesn't have nearly as good a showing when the memory latency goes up. Still seems to me there are plenty of 533 parts at 3 3 3 and that certainly seems a viable use for AMD cpus. Oh well. It's not to be, and I guess that is that.

:)
[Posted by: Anemone | Date: 01/18/05 03:41:28 AM]
You must log in to reply

[1-2]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me

Our Sponsors