Information

Dear forum members,
We are delighted to inform you that our forums are back online. Every single topic and post are now on their places and everything works just as before, only better. Welcome back!



Discussion

Discussion on Article:
PowerColor X850 XT and PowerColor X800XL Graphics Cards Review

Started by: Pritzl | Date 03/29/05 12:55:05 PM
Comments: 24 | Last Comment:  08/25/06 10:22:59 AM

Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-3]

1. 
In August of last year, I lost my head while debating some doubtful results from your IL-2 tests. ( http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/graphics-cards-2004_38.html ) I remember it because I don't usually get carried away on online forums. Anyway, it seems your numbers are more reasonable now. What turned out to be the problem?
0 0 [Posted by:  | Date: 03/29/05 12:55:05 PM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
You should not compare results obtained on totally different platforms, drivers and/or versions of the benchmarks.
0 0 [Posted by:  | Date: 03/30/05 04:02:21 AM]
Reply

2. 
I'm in agreement with John - you guys are using the Catalyst 5.2 drivers when in fact there is a 5.3 driver avaliable. And do you think it's funny that in Chronicles of Riddick, that ALL Radeon cards lock in at 52 fps in ALL resolutions, including the higher ones?? Sounds like Catalyst 5.3 may have fixed that problem, but since you use 5.2, we won't ever know. Also, where's the S3 Gammachrome review?
0 0 [Posted by:  | Date: 03/29/05 08:20:04 PM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
The reviews are made not in one day and it takes some time to get review online. We test, then write reviews based on the tests of an array of boards. Which is why we are sometimes behind the drivers.
0 0 [Posted by:  | Date: 03/30/05 04:01:33 AM]
Reply
 
Ok, that's cool. Also, when can we expect to see the S3 Gammachrome video card review?
0 0 [Posted by:  | Date: 03/30/05 08:04:01 AM]
Reply

3. 
why do you say the x800xl is best bang for the buck when it isn't priced anywhere near 299$
0 0 [Posted by:  | Date: 03/30/05 09:19:57 AM]
Reply

[1-3]

Back to the Article

Add your Comment