<%BANNER[top_768x90]%>
<%BANNER[left_160x600_1]%>
<%BANNER[banner_468x60_h]%>

Discussion

<%BANNER[fp_160x600_r_1]%>

Discussion on Article:
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ Dual-Core Processor Review

Started by: pma | Date 05/09/05 04:59:03 AM
Comments: 175 | Last Comment:  06/30/08 12:43:08 PM

21. 
Good CPU!
[Posted by: Tom | Date: 07/15/05 06:42:32 AM]
You must log in to reply
22. 
please give me info abt amd athlon64 proc
at
harshal_always_loves_you@yahoo.com
[Posted by: harshal | Date: 07/16/05 06:17:46 AM]
You must log in to reply
23. 
Good review lads, very encouraging
[Posted by: mightyhoops | Date: 09/22/05 04:15:46 PM]
You must log in to reply
24. 
I think intel is crap to be perfectly honest with you because it plays rubbish games and the intel extreme edition is the crap version of the X2.
[Posted by: rebel | Date: 09/29/05 05:17:52 AM]
You must log in to reply
25. 
AMD rocks.
[Posted by: Navrax | Date: 10/12/05 05:39:50 AM]
You must log in to reply
26. 
I'm not a genious, but i just want to know how much a AMD 64 X2 4200+ would be at? Is it the same rate as the other AMD 64's?
Would it be like this? : 4200+ = ca. 3Ghz??
[Posted by: Confused | Date: 10/14/05 07:55:34 AM]
You must log in to reply
27. 
Wow! This is great! It is fast! wooooooooooo!
[Posted by: Rondel | Date: 11/10/05 08:31:36 PM]
You must log in to reply
28. 
Like poop! Please send to me some poop!
forrepair@37.com
[Posted by: selenaverdi, from Romania | Date: 01/10/06 02:01:53 PM]
You must log in to reply
29. 
Could I say that comparing, price and performance in gaming aplications an Athlon 64 2.4Ghz 4000+ is better than a Athlon 64 X2 2.4Ghz 4800+ ??
[Posted by: Matthias | Date: 02/02/06 07:35:16 AM]
You must log in to reply
30. 
could mention something about prices :D
[Posted by: h3mbr3nt | Date: 02/03/06 10:46:33 AM]
You must log in to reply
31. 
Intel rocks. There daul-core processors are way better. i have a 2 hps with all the same things, except for processor. the AMD Athlon™ 64 X2 Dual-Core Processor was out-performed when i tried it with the Pentium D. Pentium took less time to load then the AMD. So Intel is obviously better
[Posted by: Talha Ismail | Date: 02/05/06 10:27:24 AM]
You must log in to reply
32. 
Intel rocks. There daul-core processors are way better. i have a 2 hps with all the same things, except for processor. the AMD Athlon™ 64 X2 Dual-Core Processor was out-performed when i tried it with the Pentium D. Pentium took less time to load then the AMD. So Intel is obviously better.
[Posted by: Talha Ismail | Date: 02/05/06 10:27:48 AM]
You must log in to reply
33. 
hi thre actually i have mother board of GIGA byte presently and i am using amd sempron which is actulaly an 32 bit.. i talked to ma parents and have decided to go for the purchase of X2 4800 Dual core processor,.. my question is that c

1. can i use the same mother board for this procesor
2. please tell which one is best working processors that amd has with it..
3. kindly specify the price of X2 4800 and the some of the best feauters processors's price in indian money and in which indian stores are they available

i will be highly greatful to u if u send an reply to me in Martindaniel17@msn.com

humbly
martin
[Posted by: martin | Date: 02/26/06 06:22:37 AM]
You must log in to reply
34. 
Excellent artical! Was trying to decide which way to go for a hot video editing and rendering system. I think you've cleared up the choice decisions for me; Pentium vs Athalon 64x2.
PS. Have you reviewed the 64x2 3800 as well?
[Posted by: Rick | Date: 04/01/06 02:28:59 PM]
You must log in to reply
35. 
I'm in the processof upgrading my home computer system and find this to be one of the best sources of tech information on the net. This has helped me gain an understanding of dual core vs single core processors. Also, a companion artical on the Intel Pentium D 920/930 processors have added insight on performance differences between AMD and Intel.
Thanks for your efforts, it has aided me in my search for the next generation of home computer.
[Posted by: Milo | Date: 04/07/06 05:16:17 PM]
You must log in to reply
36. 
Hi everyone! I think your site is very interesting and useful. I always bookmarked it.
[Posted by: osru | Date: 05/11/06 05:08:18 AM]
You must log in to reply
37. 
I think your site is very interesting and useful.
[Posted by: osru | Date: 05/14/06 05:04:47 AM]
You must log in to reply
38. 
Hi! Good site! I like it! Thank you!
[Posted by: osru | Date: 05/14/06 05:28:40 AM]
You must log in to reply
39. 
Hi everyone! I think your site is very interesting and useful. I always bookmarked it.
Thank You very much!!! If interesting please visit my site, Its site about pharmacy in Inet:
cialis
buy cialis
generic cialis
cheap cialis
[url=http://history.misu.nodak.edu:8080/refs/uploads/1/cialis html]cialis[/url]
[url=http://history.misu.nodak.edu:8080/refs/uploads/1/buy-c alis.html]buy cialis[/url]
[url=http://history.misu.nodak.edu:8080/refs/uploads/1/gener c-cialis.html]generic cialis[/url]
[url=http://history.misu.nodak.edu:8080/refs/uploads/1/chea -cialis.html]cheap cialis[/url]
[Posted by: osru | Date: 05/14/06 01:04:20 PM]
You must log in to reply
40. 
Hi everyone! I think your site is very interesting and useful. I always bookmarked it.
Thank You very much!!! If interesting please visit my site, Its site about pharmacy in Inet:
buy viagra
cheap viagra
viagra online
order viagra
[url=http://history.misu.nodak.edu:8080/refs/uploads/1/buy-v agra.html]buy viagra[/url]
[url=http://history.misu.nodak.edu:8080/refs/uploads/1/chea -viagra.html]cheap viagra[/url]
[url=http://history.misu.nodak.edu:8080/refs/uploads/1/viagr -online.html]viagra online[/url]
[url=http://history.misu.nodak.edu:8080/refs/uploads/1/orde -viagra.html]order viagra[/url]
[Posted by: osru | Date: 05/14/06 05:05:00 PM]
You must log in to reply

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me

Our Sponsors