18.
This review was not interesting at all for one simple reason: the most of the games in your tests were not a challenge for these graphic cards.
What is the benefit for me in knowing that one card produced 1,000,000 fps while another 1,000,001 fps? Who will really appreciate this margin? Based on your review I can come to only one conclusion: all the cards are very fast, so the best one is the cheapest one. But who needs to buy those expensive cards for those lazy games?
The only bit that somehow drew my attention was that LOCK ON simulator made your winner card look pathetic with under 20 fps.
What about MS Flight Simulator? This is the ground where the margin of 10 fps will really make the difference and I would invest my money in the technology for every 5 fps.
I have a Pentium D with 2G DDR RAM class system and
I am looking for any dissent solution that will make my MS Flight Simulator experience enjoyable. The ASUS card is only 8-11 fps there, with settings not completely on its maximum and scenery is something like default Heathrow airport. Any increase in fps is really appreciated and the miracle card will be the one which will reach acceptable 25 fps first.
So, I think, all your hard effort did not help at all.
[
Posted by: apatity

|
Date: 02/21/06 04:55:02 AM]