1.
OK, why would you say this processor is "overclocked" in your opening paragraph. By definition, Intel cannot overclock processors, since they define the baseline by releasing it a certain speed. Only going over that baseline would constitute overclocking.
On top of this, these processors have so much potential clock speed it isn't even that Intel is pushing it past where they should be. So even using the incorrect definition of overclocking, it isn't.
You guys should get native English speakers to proofread your articles. I don't mean that to sound nasty, because your English is way better than my Russian, but you easily improve the quality of your articles simply by having someone very proficient in English look over them and help you rewrite them. While the articles are generally understandable, there is some awkward English and strange uses of words that would be easily spotted by a native speaker and would improve your articles. It's so easy to do, why not do it?
For example, while I know you wouldn't intentional misuse overclock, it starts off the article as biased and misrepresents what Intel did. It's an important distinction, but very easily made by someone for whom English isn't their first tongue.
On top of this, these processors have so much potential clock speed it isn't even that Intel is pushing it past where they should be. So even using the incorrect definition of overclocking, it isn't.
You guys should get native English speakers to proofread your articles. I don't mean that to sound nasty, because your English is way better than my Russian, but you easily improve the quality of your articles simply by having someone very proficient in English look over them and help you rewrite them. While the articles are generally understandable, there is some awkward English and strange uses of words that would be easily spotted by a native speaker and would improve your articles. It's so easy to do, why not do it?
For example, while I know you wouldn't intentional misuse overclock, it starts off the article as biased and misrepresents what Intel did. It's an important distinction, but very easily made by someone for whom English isn't their first tongue.
[Posted by: TA152H
| Date: 03/22/06 08:42:45 AM]
| Date: 03/22/06 08:42:45 AM]


