I find it hard to belive that you found the monitor with the worst combined times to be the best of the bunch. Especially when there are those like the NEC models that have such drastically better numbers. Even if you look at just the rise time, other models score better. You do a comparison of response times to see which is best, then give it to one of the worst because it doesn't give up as much viewing angle?
Motion blur on an lcd is the product of pixels either not lighting fast enough, or not falling off quick enough, end result is the same. You have pixels lit that shouldn't be, or pixels that should be lit that aren't. Pixel drop off time is every bit as important as pixel rise time, possilby even more so.
07/22/03 12:51:26 PM]