1.
Weird test. It seems mostly really thorough, but then he starts complaining about ICE not working with B&W negatives. That's true, but it's a problem with the ICE tehcnology and not with this particular scanner.
Also scanning a 4x6 print at 4800dpi seems pointless, except to see how long time it will take. Even sacnning a print at 600dpi would be overkill.
And maybe that's why the tester didi it, but as he don't say it's difficult to know. Once you start to question comments/tests it's difficult to know how much to trust other results.
Also scanning a 4x6 print at 4800dpi seems pointless, except to see how long time it will take. Even sacnning a print at 600dpi would be overkill.
And maybe that's why the tester didi it, but as he don't say it's difficult to know. Once you start to question comments/tests it's difficult to know how much to trust other results.
[Posted by: NN
| Date: 05/13/06 10:59:25 AM]
| Date: 05/13/06 10:59:25 AM]


