Hardware News
Galleries
Forums
Links
Check Prices
<%BANNER[top_768x90]%>
Home
CPU
Mainboards
Memory
Video
Storage
Multimedia
Cooling/PSU
Monitors
Networking
Mobile
Other
Search
Newsletter
Services
RSS
PDA | Mobile
Enter E-mail to manage your subscription
Make Home Page
Add to Favorites
All articles and hardware news
Articles only
News only
PDA/Mobile optimized site:
http://pda.xbitlabs.com
<%BANNER[left_160x600_1]%>
<%BANNER[banner_468x60_h]%>
Discussion
Discussion on Article:
Intel Finally Unveils 65nm Intel Xeon Chips.
Started by:
1234 |
Date
05/24/06 06:55:34 AM
Comments:
5 |
Last Comment:
05/25/06 04:10:41 AM
Expand all threads
|
Collapse all threads
[
1-2
]
1.
Finally Dempsey is here. It will not stay long but its a nice step for Xeons until Woodcrest arrives which will really cause some mayhem according to a number of previews.
[
Posted by:
1234 |
Date:
05/24/06 06:55:34 AM]
You must log in to reply
+ expand thread (2 answers)
- collapse thread
Woodcrest = Conroe
Or you expect that Woodcrest outperform Conroe?
The only differential factor is FBdimm, but if I understand it, this will allow to increase the number of memory banks and capacity.
[
Posted by:
Kaz |
Date:
05/24/06 09:45:48 AM]
You must log in to reply
Theres hardly anything more different than Woodcrest and Conroe, with the former surely outperforming the latter.
[
Posted by:
1234 |
Date:
05/24/06 02:27:21 PM]
You must log in to reply
2.
Xeons suck dick... Never buy these...
[
Posted by:
31415 |
Date:
05/24/06 11:56:02 AM]
You must log in to reply
+ expand thread (1 answer)
- collapse thread
Opterons suck ...........ah this is just stupid.
[
Posted by:
123 |
Date:
05/25/06 04:10:41 AM]
You must log in to reply
[
1-2
]
Back to the Article
You must log in to add comments.
Forgot password?
Registration
Username
Password
remember me