Discussion

Discussion on Article:
Contemporary Dual-Core Desktop Processors Shootout

Started by: coldpower27 | Date 07/19/06 03:48:35 PM
Comments: 89 | Last Comment:  12/05/07 08:31:34 PM

Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-20 | 21-40 | 41-60 | 61-69]

41. 
I see that the faster (4MB) Conroes draw less power at idle than the 2MB parts. Is there anyone here to help explain this, as it's pretty illogical?

[Posted by: Wirko  | Date: 07/25/06 12:56:07 AM]
You must log in to reply
+ expand thread (1 answer)
42. 
Probably the best, Conroe vs AMD review I read. period.
[Posted by: esKwyre  | Date: 07/28/06 10:30:58 AM]
You must log in to reply
43. 
But, are the power consumption values of the core2duo processor correct ?
I cannot believe that a CPU with 4 MB of cache has a lower level of power consumption than a CPU with 2MB in idle.
[Posted by: Alefello  | Date: 08/02/06 02:23:03 AM]
You must log in to reply
44. 
Great article!
[Posted by: Joe  | Date: 08/17/06 01:33:11 AM]
You must log in to reply
45. 
This article confirmed my purchase of an E6600 CPU over AMD's X2 5000+
[Posted by: xzav  | Date: 08/24/06 10:53:20 PM]
You must log in to reply
46. 
very clear picture.
Tks
[Posted by: Stephen  | Date: 09/04/06 12:08:03 AM]
You must log in to reply
47. 
Ottimo articolo, anche se letto da un italiano
[Posted by: zebha  | Date: 09/15/06 08:20:03 AM]
You must log in to reply
48. 
Ok
[Posted by: SoberWarlock  | Date: 09/15/06 05:46:08 PM]
You must log in to reply
49. 
Great work breaking down the details. Particularly apperciated the Price VS performance graph. Helped me to decide between Dell 520, 521, and 510. Thanks
[Posted by: NEWS2ME  | Date: 09/16/06 12:12:14 PM]
You must log in to reply
50. 
full infomations and very good analys between AMD & INTEL
after you are no problem to buy something depend of your money
[Posted by: TOMKAHN  | Date: 09/19/06 09:41:32 AM]
You must log in to reply
51. 
I wish you had a wiki to do editing, because some of this info is not up to date or semi-correct. Overall excellent. Using info for tech seminars
[Posted by: Webster  | Date: 09/25/06 10:58:42 AM]
You must log in to reply
52. 
good job!!!(* ^ーﾟ)b
[Posted by: Takk  | Date: 10/09/06 11:06:14 PM]
You must log in to reply
53. 
Don´t you think? And about games test?! Loser
[Posted by: Marcux  | Date: 10/22/06 02:52:53 PM]
You must log in to reply
+ expand thread (1 answer)
54. 
its very helpfull for my buying option...
thank by wrote this article !!!
(sorry, but my english its a bit poor :) )
[Posted by: franksaurus@yahoo.es  | Date: 10/27/06 06:24:43 AM]
You must log in to reply
55. 
excelent article.
[Posted by: puppetmaster  | Date: 10/30/06 05:16:11 AM]
You must log in to reply
56. 
Did they use 64bit windows? AMD is not good in 32bit environment.
[Posted by: Esko  | Date: 11/08/06 11:02:39 PM]
You must log in to reply
57. 
Excelent job, with everything discussed and detailed.
[Posted by: Leandro Nobushi Hoshiko  | Date: 11/18/06 11:34:05 AM]
You must log in to reply
58. 
THANK YOU
[Posted by: ALFA 3001  | Date: 11/26/06 11:18:05 AM]
You must log in to reply
59. 
eat a dick
[Posted by: nobody  | Date: 12/13/06 04:33:10 AM]
You must log in to reply
60. 
I wish the reviewers would do a better job of explaining what is being measured in all these charts. I am particularly interested in the gaming charts.
[Posted by: Walleye  | Date: 12/17/06 01:59:07 AM]
You must log in to reply

[1-20 | 21-40 | 41-60 | 61-69]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me

Our Sponsors

Western Digital Epiphan Systems