<%BANNER[top_768x90]%>
<%BANNER[left_160x600_1]%>
<%BANNER[banner_468x60_h]%>

Discussion

<%BANNER[fp_160x600_r_1]%>

Discussion on Article:
Contemporary Dual-Core Desktop Processors Shootout

Started by: coldpower27 | Date 07/19/06 03:48:35 PM
Comments: 89 | Last Comment:  12/05/07 08:31:34 PM

Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-20 | 21-40 | 41-60 | 61-69]

1. 
This article is exemplrary, thank you for including the msot relevant processor in the article.

It would be nice though if you had the Pentium D 805 but other then that, I don't have complaints.
[Posted by: coldpower27 | Date: 07/19/06 03:48:35 PM]

2. 
Please keep in mind that the Athlon has the Memory Controller integrated into the CPU which will inflate the power usage numbers! At this stage it is really difficult to compare power usage because it is an apples to oranges situation.
[Posted by: mamisano | Date: 07/19/06 03:59:35 PM]
+ expand thread (2 answers)

3. 
weak benchies.
thin.
[Posted by: boner | Date: 07/19/06 04:00:06 PM]
+ expand thread (2 answers)

4. 
The message is clear... Intel has failed.
[Posted by: Dr. Peace | Date: 07/19/06 05:35:54 PM]

5. 
So true Dr. Peace, they have failed -- failed to to give AMD much of a chance for the next 1+ years it seems..

As always an excellent article from Xbit.
[Posted by: Furty | Date: 07/19/06 07:12:15 PM]

6. 
Awesome Review! I loved those extra charts on page 13. I planned to buy an E6600 and after reading this review, I'm definately buying an E6600.
[Posted by: Eddie B. | Date: 07/19/06 07:47:59 PM]
+ expand thread (7 answers)

7. 
A comprehensive review on dual-core processors. Should give the readers all of the improtant points to ponder on choosing which of them to buy.
[Posted by: ryan | Date: 07/19/06 08:02:04 PM]

8. 
Could you update this article when you get your hands on the AMD EE and SFEE models.
[Posted by: 1 | Date: 07/19/06 08:26:48 PM]

9. 
Excellent article with some very insightful and relevant analysis at the end. Another good job. :)
[Posted by: MTX | Date: 07/19/06 09:42:01 PM]

10. 
excelent article.

if it werent for the expensive Intel motherboards there'd be no doubt a 6600 would be my next system.
[Posted by: Lostfaith | Date: 07/20/06 12:40:16 AM]

11. 
CONROE,, CPU of the year..
[Posted by: grbr | Date: 07/20/06 01:04:52 AM]

12. 
This was an excellent article.

And only shows that I must be fast upgrading from socket A to socket 939.

150€ for mobo and processor. However I will go single core 3500+ or 3800+. I don’t see many reasons for going dual core.
[Posted by: Kaz | Date: 07/20/06 02:42:35 AM]

13. 
Conroe azz-raping the world in power consumption, consuming only HALF THE POWER.
Plus it shows the whole world who really fakes their TDPs... Conroe is 6-21W below its TDP, Presler is 1-6W below its TDP, K8 is up to 11W ABOVE its TDP.
[Posted by: 1234 | Date: 07/20/06 04:08:43 AM]

14. 
On the performace-per-Gigahertz chart, why the 2MB parts of Conroe have a so poor scalability?
[Posted by: Anonimous | Date: 07/20/06 04:15:53 AM]

15. 
u morons why didn't u add intel 805 which is the largest selling processor in the retail segment
[Posted by: anonymous5 | Date: 07/20/06 07:44:25 AM]

16. 
Any 64bit benchmarks in the works?
[Posted by: NA | Date: 07/20/06 10:38:41 AM]

17. 
yeah 64-bit test would be interesting
[Posted by: hey | Date: 07/20/06 11:36:21 AM]

18. 
Intel is back with a big bang, HIGH performance, LOW thermal dissipation. the older days are back, AMD chips once again have higher power consumption and lower performance. The Energy Efficient X2's should help thermals, but they are priced at a permium, and perhaps cannot match the performance per watt of the Core 2 Duo's.

Awesome article X-Bit :)
[Posted by: psycho_mccrazy | Date: 07/20/06 05:38:45 PM]

19. 
This is an excellent article.

It clearly shows that AMD are missing the boat with their existing X2's but it also shows that IF they can get both 65nm and K8L out the door then they should have a fighting chance. Good as Core 2 is it isn't unassailable. An average of 20% is a catchable target.
[Posted by: AlanSymes | Date: 07/20/06 07:16:31 PM]

20. 
Perfect
[Posted by: NoX | Date: 07/21/06 02:44:12 AM]

[1-20 | 21-40 | 41-60 | 61-69]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me