Make Home Page
Add to Favorites
1.
You couldn't comment on what the Bad-Axe 2 adds over the original Bad-Axe can you? Official DDR2 800 support perhaps?
[Posted by: Data | Date: 09/28/06 02:59:25 PM]
Discussion
Discussion on Article:
Intel Kentsfield Preview
Started by: Data | Date 09/28/06 02:59:25 PM
Comments: 11 | Last Comment: 11/28/06 09:33:50 PM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads
[1-9]
2.
Kentsfield is Intel gun to do>>>
[Posted by: Waffer | Date: 09/30/06 09:08:46 AM]
3.
YOUR FUCKING SITE SUCKS
[Posted by: LOL POO | Date: 10/02/06 05:14:32 AM]
4.
Might have good performance in 3d renderind, i would buy one when the prices go down april 2007 maybe.
[Posted by: J3d | Date: 10/02/06 07:37:19 AM]
5.
Is the case on the first photo an Antec TX1050B?
[Posted by: Roman from Warsaw | Date: 10/15/06 03:46:11 PM]
6.
This article should have had benchmarks to show this processor in the majority of softwares.
Photoshop, WinRar, Productivity programs, games etc.
As it is, what was shown was a lopsided test without a comparitive analysis of the majority softwares.
Yes, we were told in the final word that there are not many softwares that will (at this time) take advantage of the quad core but there should have been diagrams showing the comparisons as many do not read the final conclusions.
Poorly written for that reason. I know one can say that this was written to show the difference of quad core in applications that make use of the cores but there should have been a more holistic viewing of the maximum softwares out there that do not take advantage of these cores.
Unfinished work. Well written for what it accomplished but poorly written for not accomplishing a fully fleshed showing.
R
Photoshop, WinRar, Productivity programs, games etc.
As it is, what was shown was a lopsided test without a comparitive analysis of the majority softwares.
Yes, we were told in the final word that there are not many softwares that will (at this time) take advantage of the quad core but there should have been diagrams showing the comparisons as many do not read the final conclusions.
Poorly written for that reason. I know one can say that this was written to show the difference of quad core in applications that make use of the cores but there should have been a more holistic viewing of the maximum softwares out there that do not take advantage of these cores.
Unfinished work. Well written for what it accomplished but poorly written for not accomplishing a fully fleshed showing.
R
[Posted by: Ropey | Date: 10/17/06 02:29:08 PM]
7.
4 cores. 8 cores. 16 cores. 80 cores. Whatever...
[Posted by: w00t | Date: 10/22/06 09:28:50 PM]
9.
I read in your previous article that, new PCs dont necessarily require 2GB RAM. How about testing this quad processor with 2GB RAM vs 1GB RAM?
[Posted by: samrat | Date: 11/28/06 09:33:50 PM]
[1-9]
Our Sponsors
