1.
"Provided that the rumoured information above is correct and AMD’s plans do not change, a year from now there will still be a bunch of 32-bit only CPUs from AMD. This means that software developers will not be very interested in optimizing their products for higher-end AMD 64-bit CPUs earlier than in 2005 or even later timeframe. This means that AMD may loose one of its very important advantages in case there are more 32-bit only processors than 32-/64-bit chips in the market."
If there is demand for cheep 32-bit CPUs AMD will supply for that demand. Plus users who buy a 754-pin AthlonXP will be able to upgrade to a 754-pin Athlon64. Intel has 80% of the desktop marke, if developers port to x86-64 they arn't going to do it because 20% of the market is capable of 64-bit. And actually it comes back to supply and demand if people demand 64-bit software, then it will be supplied by the developers. It comes down to money, not that AMD is still selling 32-bit CPUs.
If there is demand for cheep 32-bit CPUs AMD will supply for that demand. Plus users who buy a 754-pin AthlonXP will be able to upgrade to a 754-pin Athlon64. Intel has 80% of the desktop marke, if developers port to x86-64 they arn't going to do it because 20% of the market is capable of 64-bit. And actually it comes back to supply and demand if people demand 64-bit software, then it will be supplied by the developers. It comes down to money, not that AMD is still selling 32-bit CPUs.
[Posted by: supply_and_demand | Date: 08/21/03 09:57:18 AM]





