X-bit labs

Started by: mamisano | Date 10/31/06

Comments: 38 | Last Comment:  04/18/08

[1-20 | 21-22]

1. Any plan to test the newer Hitachi T7K500 which just recently hit the streets? The 7K500 is a last generation product and I am curious how well the new drives perform.

yes

and Samsung HD401LJ?
it would be nice to see some opinions on the noise of these drives

Samsung HDD support interesting technology - CCQ

(cool, cold, quiet) :)

2. i meant Samsung HD501LJ

There is no such disk

according to samsung-s website there is
http://www.samsung.com/Products/HardDiskDrive/SpinPointTSeries/HardDiskDrive_SpinPointTSeries_HD501LJ.asp
the HD401LJ is from the T133 series
the HD501LJ is from the T166 series

This disk while is only on a paper...

3. What ever happend to heat and noise comparison? And power consumption? I use big disk in raid5 usually like 8 disks to store data on. 1. reliability 2. noise (heat = more fans = more power and noise) 3. peformance.l Thats how I choose big disks. For pure peformance I go for Raptor or 15k scsi disks anyway.

And can also the moon from the sky?

Either silence, or speed.

4. How can these results be compared to drives of the same family in other sizes? Right now the 320GB drives are a very good balance of $/GB, overall size, and real price. Would the 320GB drive results be the same (relative rankings) as the 500GB results? I am thinking mainly of Seagate 7200.10 vs WD RE2 SATA3.0 in 320GB.

Results are similar

Yea often they are but not always. Sometimes it depends on the number of platters and the data density on platters. Ex: 500GB 4 platter versus 250GB 2 platter ought to be very similar, but that doesn't always apply to odd sizes that don't use full platters. Oooh well..

5. Another vote for heat and noise charts, sorely missed, how can a review blah blah missing data blah blah best comparison blah blah heat and noise should be done blah blah

blah blah blah

What for to you to know temperature of a hard disk, if it obviously less critical?

6. lol, I dived at Sipidan earlier this year, I was so amazed by the place I set up a google alert for "sipidan" - which in turn linked me to your review about the new seagate baracudas - my favourite drives! Better in so many ways than even the WD Raptors IMHO. Thanks for the article, and the memory!

:)
pro bono publico

7. Why testing the old 7K500 and not the new T7K500 series from Hitachi?

i really don't understand either, they do have the older model of seagate.............

8. A bit weak to not mention the very low score of the seagate drives during the multithread test in the conlusion.

9. The 7200.10-series are the bomb! :D
they where added to my wishlist a long time ago.. (i realy need to save some more money :P )

10. Excellent review, but i miss drives from Samsung.

11. great work!

How do the diffent drives stack up in

- performance across the drive (slowest, fastest, weighed average taking into account that 'slowest' is extra punished for each read taking longer too)

- cleanliness in the performance across the drive (spikes, patterns, ups/downs, oscillations)

- true random content with near and far autocorrelation (random blocks, random multiple blocks), to eliminate OS design favouring one or the other type of content and make it truly a shootout between the caching algorithms where they should be handicapped most

- power draw, especially when copying across the same drive

- operational temperature read from the drive, and measured on the outside


Mike

WARNING: I recently had to return and/or RMA a _bunch_ of Maxtor SATA 500s. One was clearly damaged physically (the actual black physical casing was bent, hard, no mean feat! dropped from 2 stories onto a concrete floor, perhaps?), the other three were just DOA. I've been a Maxtor fan for years, but they seem to be going thru transition pains.

WD SE16s were absolutely fine substitutes for a RAID 0 config on Asus mobo.

12. Why dont you test with 7200.10 400gb model , which uses 2 platter and has the most highest density of 200 per platter!!

7200.10 400GB use 3 platters & 5 heads

13. According to Maxtor, Seagate will maintain a line of "Maxtor branded" products. Does this mean they will be Seagate products labeled with Maxtor's name or a different line of products?

Seagate hard drives with "Maxtor" label.

14. Hi,

For performance oriented systems it would be nice to see test results of 2 or 4 disk RAID configuration (especially multithreaded tests). I guess multhithreaded test results may look differently.

Rated as average.

Best regards,
Thanks.

15. Perhaps the most important factor for probably the MAIN home use of these very large drives is NOISE. You give no noise levels. Honestly, any of them would be FAST enough for an HTPC, we could not care less about the speed. However, the NOISE level generated varies much more than performance and is also a much more important selection criteria for HTPCs.

16. COMPUTER OPERAS UGANDA LIMITED.
PLOT 10 KIMATHI AVENUE,
PO BOX 9535 KAMPALA UGANDA,
EAST-AFRICA.
TEL: +256772655208.
TEL: +256774170503.
Email: comp_opera@operamail.com


REF: PURCHASING OF COMPUTER HARD WARES.

Dear Sir/Madam.
We are ugandans importers of computer system and all computer hard wares.
We have been going on your website and found the computer Hard Disk Drives we would
like to purchase from your company, and those Hard Disk Drives are here
bellow:

Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 Familly ATA ST 3200820A
500pieces.


We request you to quote the total costs of those 500pieces of
Hard Disk Drives with the shipping charges to CIF Entebbe
International Airport Uganda (Eastafrica), send the proforma
invoice as an attachement on this email.
Reply urgently for payments are ready.
We are looking forward to hearing from you very soon.

Best regards,
Colline Opiyo.

Purchasing Manager,
COMPUTER OPERAS UGANDA LIMITED.
PLOT 10 KIMATHI AVENUE,
PO BOX 9535 KAMPALA UGANDA,
EAST-AFRICA.
TEL: +256772655208.
TEL: +256774170503.
Email: comp_opera@operamail.com

Nice try, scammer idiot.

17. thx for the time you guys put into this i used it

18. ohhh yaaa i'd like to see noise here but SPCR covers noise well just not speed very well...

http://www.silentpcreview.com/article617-page2.html

19. Few if any comments on power consumption, noise, vibration. Marks lost.

20. Superb test I've ever read...Tx...

[1-20 | 21-22]