1.
The review is not bad and you must have put quite a lot of work into it. However, I have a remark about benchmarks. They are the weakest link. Only synthetics :(. Could you update them to something more sensible? You could even leave them, and add several real-word testing scenarios to the suite.
BTW, there is no way this review is from 14.11.2006. I was checking your website just after 1:00 am of CET, on 16.11.2006, and it still was not there.
One more question: what are the guys responsible for G80 reviews doing? I liked the first part (architecture review), from over a week ago, but it seems to me that they are not going to follow with performance analysis. Are they hiding under the rock? Are they always that slow?
BTW, there is no way this review is from 14.11.2006. I was checking your website just after 1:00 am of CET, on 16.11.2006, and it still was not there.
One more question: what are the guys responsible for G80 reviews doing? I liked the first part (architecture review), from over a week ago, but it seems to me that they are not going to follow with performance analysis. Are they hiding under the rock? Are they always that slow?
[Posted by: Reader | Date: 11/16/06 01:23:12 AM]





