X-bit labs

Started by: Ibrahim Jadoon | Date 12/19/06

Comments: 7 | Last Comment:  03/29/07

[1-6]

1. You want to back up that "no overclocking" claim?

And since when is "low power consumption" a con???

~Ibrahim~

P.S. Otherwise: KICK ASS.

>And since when is "low power consumption" a con???

There must be "high", instead of "low", of course. Corrected.

2. Why are there no reviews of the AGP variant? We're quite a few who want to know if this is The Card for the last AGP upgrade.

3. Why not compare this cooling solution to a Zalman VF700-CU?

The Arctic Cooling graphics card solution I tried was terrible compared to what a Zalman could do. Maybe then you'd have a little more success at overclocking.

The hype of this card being silent is just that, hype. There is virtually no difference between it and a regular 1950 Pro so why not say that right up front so I don't have to read a huge review of a product that provides nothing new.

4. The results in PF are absolutely odd! You guys maybe have used a not recommended catalyst driver to run in Pacific Fighters series.

The 7600GT performes a half that you have reported... weird enough.

5. Fully agree with script: Thanx for your efforts, good team!

6. Lows:

Rather high power consumption: EXPECTED!
Long PCB and the non-standard cooler may make it impossible to install the card into a small system case: EXPECTED!
Dual-slot cooling system: EXPECTED
Inconvenient position of the power connector: NOT TRUE FOR ALL!
Zero overclockability: NOT TRUE FOR ALL!
CrossFire bridge is missing among the accessories: NOT TRUE FOR ALL! Ihad mine!
Full version of the user manual is missing: VERY TRUE - Because ATI has so many variants?

[1-6]