Information

Did you know you could become an X-bit labs fan on Facebook or follow us on Twitter?



Discussion

Discussion on Article:
Highly Defined: ATI Radeon HD 2000 Architecture Review

Started by: Niels | Date 05/15/07 03:27:53 PM
Comments: 21 | Last Comment:  08/19/07 06:15:26 AM

Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-5]

1. 
Why not use 8.38 Driver??
0 0 [Posted by:  | Date: 05/15/07 03:27:53 PM]
Reply
2. 
please benchmark SpecViewPref 9.03 when you do all the benchmarks and specific if used Vista or XP.
http://www.spec.org/gpc/downloadindex.html

Some of us do 3D work as a Hobby or currently a student and usually can not afford those killer prices of FireGL and Quadro cards. When DailyTech posted the SpecViewPref scores beating the QuadroFX5600 i can only dream for this to be real but no one hardware review site has ran this benchmark so please be the first.

Thanks
0 0 [Posted by:  | Date: 05/15/07 10:26:34 PM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
Hello Chris

I am glad to inform you that the SpecViewPref 9.03 benchmark results are going to be revealed in the upcoming article covering games and semi synthetic performance.

Thank you for your interest and suggestion.
0 0 [Posted by:  | Date: 05/16/07 03:56:05 AM]
Reply
 
Yaroslav:

Thanks for the future SpecVew score. BTW is there a reason you guys do not benchmark Age of Empires 3 anymore, i found it strange that the last benchmark you did the game the X1950XTX almost receive the same FPS as the 8800GTX. I was hoping for some fellow up on this but you guys never did another AOE3 benchmark.

Thanks again,
Chris
0 0 [Posted by:  | Date: 05/16/07 05:34:47 AM]
Reply
3. 
when is this upcoming article going to be released?
0 0 [Posted by:  | Date: 05/16/07 04:14:29 AM]
Reply
4. 
AMD/ATI releases this absolute flop of a gpu. I currently own an 8800GTS and wanted to upgrade to an R600 as soon as would comer out because i thought it would blow the 8800 series out of the water! How dissappointing this card is!It has trouble keeping up with a gpu that is almost 6 months old now, it draws more power and definitly is a step back in pice/performance per watt.ATI and AMD really dont deserve any credit for their GPUs and CPUs lately. what if nvidia gets out an 65nm 8900GTx or something with more shaders still and higher clocks? AMD-ATI is doomed and brought their doom omly to themselves!
0 0 [Posted by:  | Date: 05/16/07 08:14:01 AM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
R600 isnt that bad
8.37.4 drivers suck
just look some benchmarks run with 8.37.2
a hell of a difference
the drivers are still too immature,thats a bad thing..
when drivers will shape up, you will see that the R600 will perform a lot better
0 0 [Posted by:  | Date: 05/16/07 11:23:54 AM]
Reply
5. 
r 600 sucks man .....poor very poor....
0 0 [Posted by:  | Date: 05/23/07 07:25:52 AM]
Reply

[1-5]

Back to the Article

Add your Comment


Our Sponsors

Crucial.com Western Digital G.Skill