Discussion

Discussion on Article:

Started by: Chrisman! | Date 06/11/07
Comments: 10 | Last Comment:  11/01/07

[1-9]

1. "making less platters with higher capacity is more preferrable THAN manufacturing more platters with lower capacities"
[Posted by: Chrisman! | Date: 06/11/07]

2. cant complain about a 1TB hdd ;)
[Posted by: ThaCrip | Date: 06/11/07]

3. this wud atleast make hitachi and seagate think about reducing their retail prices

it'll be interesting to see the price of this one
[Posted by: radicalx | Date: 06/12/07]

4. platter 334GB....WOW..
[Posted by: WOW | Date: 06/13/07]

5. The more platters and the more heads the more likely it is to fail. Its probably worth waiting for when they have 500GB's per platter. so that theres only two. If thats how it works. I don't know. Not to mention how much of the 1TB you actually get. My drive was 250GB's. But I only have 233 of it.
[Posted by: blah | Date: 06/15/07]
Yeah I usually like to stick to HD which only have 2 platters but 3 is still not too shabby.
[Posted by: coldpower27 | Date: 06/18/07]

6. Wow, and I thought that Seagate dropping it to four platters was a step forward. Talk about kudos for Samsung.

Any other disk manufacturers care to play catchup?
[Posted by: webdev511 | Date: 06/19/07]

7. Samsung seems to be on track to become the BEST HDD maker. They have the highestes areal density and for desktop application and we should get into seeing them leading the HDD industry in future.
[Posted by: MRK | Date: 06/20/07]

8. When this HD will be available in the store?
[Posted by: User78 | Date: 07/22/07]

9. Samsung Quietly Ships 1TB Hard Disk Drive. Quiet is the "bon mot". Here it is nearly 5 months later and no sign of the drive shipping...
[Posted by: BigJim | Date: 11/01/07]

[1-9]

Add your Comment

Add your Comment

Name/Nickname
Your Comments