Search<%BANNER[left_130x130_1]%>
<%BANNER[left_130x300]%>
<%BANNER[left_130x130_2]%>
<%BANNER[right_130x600]%>
|
<%BANNER[top_768x90]%>
DiscussionDiscussion on Article:
Started by: CPUZ | Date 09/18/07
Comments: 4 | Last Comment: 09/19/07
[1-3]
1. The move to 32nm will surely be impressive.
[Posted by: CPUZ | Date: 09/18/07]
2. "At the first day of its annual technology forum, Intel Corp. demonstrated the first **working** chips made using 32nm process technology."
Okay.. in this sentence.. you claim that they demonstrated "working" chips... "Even though ***such chips cannot perform any operations***, they showcase Intel’s ability to make them and once again assures that the company is on-track to produce commercial processors utilizing 32nm process technology in two years time." And in the next line.. you mention those chips can't perform... Two lines contradicts... please explain what's right... 1. Nehalem is ready, can be manufactured in 32nm technology. They can be fitted to a PC and play games straight away. 2. Nehalem is.. somewhat ready. Can be manufactured in 32nm technology. But cannot fit into a PC and play games. [Posted by: Alien | Date: 09/19/07]
 Nehalem is 45nm.Also: Intel sampled 32nm SRAM, so it's just memory... built with transistors. [Posted by: No one | Date: 09/19/07]
3. Agagagagagaga!!!!
[Posted by: Mr. BonBon | Date: 09/19/07]
[1-3]
<%BANNER[banner_468x30]%>
|