Search<%BANNER[left_130x130_1]%>
<%BANNER[left_130x300]%>
<%BANNER[left_130x130_2]%>
<%BANNER[right_130x600]%>
|
<%BANNER[top_768x90]%>
DiscussionDiscussion on Article:
Started by: Joz | Date 09/19/07
Comments: 12 | Last Comment: 09/20/07
[1-8]
1. AMD IS DOOMED!!!!
*bender voice* DOOOOOOOOOMEEEEDDDD!! with that being said.. shit, intelmonapaly... :( [Posted by: Joz | Date: 09/19/07]
2. With the advent of several 45nm variants of Penryn coming this first quarter, I guess AMD doubling their effort wouldnt be enough. They need to multiply their efforts tenfold just to battle the onslaugh from the blue camp...
[Posted by: CPUZ | Date: 09/19/07]
3. Hfff Hfff
Whats that smell? Its AMD's ass on FIRE. I guess green fanboys now have to pour their hopes on K11 cause K10 couldn't do much. [Posted by: Mr. BonBon | Date: 09/19/07]
4. I just got news of the new Intel advertisement inspired by Mastercard
Upcoming Intel Quad Core Prices: less than $250 New X38 motherboard: $100 The look on the face of AMD fanboys reading the IDF reports and crapping on their pants...... PRICELESS!!! [Posted by: Just switched sides | Date: 09/19/07]
5. This is certainly interesting considering that the Core 2 hasn't been out that long. Inter is certainly a different company than it was 10 years ago and it seems we have competition from AMD to thank for that. Before Intel would have sat on their current architecture and milked it for all it was worth thus allowing them to earn higher margins.
It will be interesting to see what AMD's moves will be. AMD's architecture was designed to scale for multiple cores since the Hammer. Intel has caught up to them in this respect so we shall have to see just which architecture will scale better. After all this is the first multicore Intel chip with an integrated memory controller. AMD has more experience in that area, but perhaps Intel's resources will more than make up for it. It will be interesting to see what happens in the coming months. [Posted by: Megamanx00 | Date: 09/19/07]
7. thing is, current versions of windows are only licensed for 2 physical processors, not 4
[Posted by: 31415 | Date: 09/19/07]
 Um...you live under a large boulder made of "i-know-nothing."?Windows XP/Vista(?) SUPPORTS two phyisical CPU sockets, the number of cores it can support however is alot more then that. [Posted by: Joz | Date: 09/19/07]
8. It's really interesting to see when Intel will (probably) tape out in advance the NGMA SandyBridge next year... what's this new beast can do about?
[Posted by: PinPin | Date: 09/20/07]
[1-8]
<%BANNER[banner_468x30]%>
|