<%BANNER[top_768x90]%>
<%BANNER[left_160x600_1]%>
<%BANNER[banner_468x60_h]%>

Discussion

<%BANNER[fp_160x600_r_1]%>

Discussion on Article:
Microsoft Admits: Customers May Not Need Vista.

Started by: alpha0ne | Date 09/29/07 02:36:54 AM
Comments: 7 | Last Comment:  02/09/08 04:03:20 PM

Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-6]

1. 
And in realspeak that means more ppl are DEMANDING that XP be installed in their new lappie/tower
[Posted by: alpha0ne | Date: 09/29/07 02:36:54 AM]

2. 
I know I got XP over Vista. I can care less about the flashy look. As far as security goes XP can be just as secure. Really all you are paying for is flashy appeal and directX10 which has still yet to impress me.
[Posted by: Jack | Date: 09/29/07 08:13:53 AM]

3. 
How about DX10 for XP?
[Posted by: Gush | Date: 09/29/07 09:17:34 AM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)

4. 
The software and driver compatibility problems need to be solved with SP1. I am getting tired of restarting my laptop due to USB driver problems.
[Posted by: RW | Date: 10/01/07 12:04:57 AM]

5. 
We must not forget that this article is misleading as Microsoft has forced people to get vista with new hardware, even when people where beging the suppliers to provide them with XP.

Most people I know will switch back to XP as soon as they can.

Some of them have moved on to Linux as Microsoft was no longer an option for them.

[Posted by: stas | Date: 10/01/07 11:17:10 AM]

6. 
40 million copies of Vista sol d

I'll buy that

the installed base of VIsta is 40 Million

Possible

I have 60 new PC's and 60 copies of Vista
however Windows XP is installed on all of them.

I guess those 60 installed licences were made up for by 60 pirated copies?
[Posted by: carl0ski | Date: 02/09/08 04:03:20 PM]

[1-6]

You must log in to add comments.
Unfortunately, the old registrations do not work anymore. Please register again. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me