Make Home Page
Add to Favorites
1.
wait what?
I can get a 3600/3800 X2 for that price, why would anyone want these?
I can get a 3600/3800 X2 for that price, why would anyone want these?
[Posted by: Joz | Date: 10/02/07 12:36:23 PM]
Discussion
Discussion on Article:
AMD Quietly Launches New Single-Core AMD Athlon LE Processors.
Started by: Joz | Date 10/02/07 12:36:23 PM
Comments: 5 | Last Comment: 10/04/07 04:50:05 PM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads
[1-4]
2.
You really need to try harder AMD.
Intels single-cores are not only faster, but also more economical. Not to mention that they like to OC by 100% and such.
And Jozī comment is also very true indeed.
Intels single-cores are not only faster, but also more economical. Not to mention that they like to OC by 100% and such.
And Jozī comment is also very true indeed.
[Posted by: 1234 | Date: 10/02/07 01:02:03 PM]
3.
>"but also more economical"
You read too much Anand tech.
You read too much Anand tech.
[Posted by: BorgDrone | Date: 10/02/07 02:37:38 PM]
4.
"For some reason the processor listings in the distributor price-lists do mention that they will have 1MB L2 cache although all existing Athlon 64 processor models feature only 512KB L2 cache onboard."
There are many types of Athlon 64's with 1MB L2 cache, for Socket 754 and 939. You should write all existing Socket AM2 Athlon 64's.
There are many types of Athlon 64's with 1MB L2 cache, for Socket 754 and 939. You should write all existing Socket AM2 Athlon 64's.
[Posted by: zim | Date: 10/04/07 04:50:05 PM]
[1-4]
You must log in to add comments.
Unfortunately, the old registrations do not work anymore. Please register again. We apologize for the inconvenience.
Our Sponsors
