Well AMD dose have a cross licensing agreement with Intel, which is why AMD chips can use SSE 1,2, and 3, and why Intel uses 64-bit extensions and a Non Execute bit instruction in their Core 2 Processors. Still, Itanium would be an instruction set and architecture owned only by Intel so only those whom had a license from Intel Could produce compatible chips. That's one reason why it hasn't taken off, people don't want their applications to be tied to Intel CPU's they way some of them use to tied to Sparc CPU's and Solaris. Yeah you can write applications to run on most of the Unixs, but some people "optimized" them for Solaris so they had to be re-written to run on anything else even with a Sparc CPU.
Honestly I think the best thing Intel could do right now for the Itanium is provide more free programming tools to help Programmers port code easily between the EPIC architecture and other architectures. Just give them enough to get interested and buy the hardware so that way they can charge a premium for better tools, kinda like they do with their x86 chips right now ^_^. They could also help the open source community by improving the GCC compiler with tools and optomizations for Itanium Architecture.
[Posted by: Megamanx00 | Date: 10/10/07 01:41:54 PM]