<%BANNER[top_768x90]%>
<%BANNER[left_160x600_1]%>
<%BANNER[banner_468x60_h]%>

Discussion

<%BANNER[fp_160x600_r_1]%>

Discussion on Article:
Sony Unveils Low-Cost PlayStation 3 40GB.

Started by: Megamanx00 | Date 10/09/07 05:18:32 PM
Comments: 6 | Last Comment:  01/04/08 06:05:58 AM

[1-6]

1. 
The device of choice huh? Sure, that's why Nintendo is selling more Game Cubes than Sony is selling PS3s :-D
[Posted by: Megamanx00 | Date: 10/09/07 05:18:32 PM]

2. 
Sony "the world’s largest maker of game consoles"....

May be but at the moment not the smartest.
[Posted by: huh | Date: 10/10/07 05:20:56 PM]

3. 
The reason why backward compatibility is axed in the 40 gig version is because the graphics processor from the ps2 is absent from it. Right now the 60 gig ps3 is only emulating the cpu from the ps2.
[Posted by: ovejon | Date: 10/11/07 12:39:57 PM]

4. 
Can play playstation 2 games without no backward compatibility on playstation 3 system?
[Posted by: Charle Lee Ray | Date: 10/31/07 03:35:53 PM]

5. 
the new ps3 40 gb is perfect for a guy like me. I am not a serious gamer and 40 gb is still a helluva lot of memory. I will never use the amount of memory that is given in the other two, (60-80gb). I will probably never use half the memory of the 40gb ps3. I also get on line capability, which was much more than I expected. I watched the spiderman 3 bluray dvd which comes with the ps3 and was completely blown away. awesome!!!!
[Posted by: dave | Date: 12/05/07 02:33:21 PM]

6. 
what the hell is this sony have to create a software which will be fully compatible with ps 2 games i am crying why have i borrowed 80 gb ps 3 model that sucks
[Posted by: wassim | Date: 01/04/08 06:05:58 AM]

[1-6]

You must log in to add comments.
Unfortunately, the old registrations do not work anymore. Please register again. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me